Text entry of physical and virtual keyboards on tablets and the user perception

Patrick Armstrong, B. Wilkinson
{"title":"Text entry of physical and virtual keyboards on tablets and the user perception","authors":"Patrick Armstrong, B. Wilkinson","doi":"10.1145/3010915.3011006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examined the text entry speed on a tablet for users using physical and software keyboards; a Bluetooth keyboard, a default software keyboard and a gesture based keyboard. We compared these to a laptop and measured adjusted words per minute and error rate. User perceptions were gathered to see if there was a noticeable difference between text entry speeds and how users viewed each keyboard's accuracy, frustration and ease of use. We found was that while there was a difference in entry speed between virtual and physical keyboards, there was no difference in speed between physical keyboards or between software keyboards. There was limited error difference between all keyboards. However despite the Bluetooth keyboard being closest to the laptop in results, user preference was greater for the gesture keyboard.","PeriodicalId":309823,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3010915.3011006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

We examined the text entry speed on a tablet for users using physical and software keyboards; a Bluetooth keyboard, a default software keyboard and a gesture based keyboard. We compared these to a laptop and measured adjusted words per minute and error rate. User perceptions were gathered to see if there was a noticeable difference between text entry speeds and how users viewed each keyboard's accuracy, frustration and ease of use. We found was that while there was a difference in entry speed between virtual and physical keyboards, there was no difference in speed between physical keyboards or between software keyboards. There was limited error difference between all keyboards. However despite the Bluetooth keyboard being closest to the laptop in results, user preference was greater for the gesture keyboard.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文本输入的物理和虚拟键盘上的平板电脑和用户的感知
我们测试了使用物理键盘和软件键盘的用户在平板电脑上的文本输入速度;一个蓝牙键盘,一个默认的软件键盘和一个手势键盘。我们将其与笔记本电脑进行了比较,并测量了调整后的每分钟字数和错误率。收集用户的感知,看看文本输入速度之间是否存在显著差异,以及用户如何看待每种键盘的准确性、挫败感和易用性。我们发现,虽然虚拟键盘和物理键盘的输入速度有所不同,但物理键盘和软件键盘之间的输入速度没有差异。所有键盘之间的错误差异有限。然而,尽管蓝牙键盘在结果上最接近笔记本电脑,但用户对手势键盘的偏好更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CrowdRisk: exploring crowdsourcing of risk information Computer assisted autism interventions for India MyCalendar: supporting families to communicate with their child on the autism spectrum Usability problems found across public self-service applications and self-service providers A player engagement model for an augmented reality game: a case of pokémon go
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1