Current evidence supporting simultaneous prophylactic gastropexy in canine patients undergoing complete splenectomy

Olivia Harris
{"title":"Current evidence supporting simultaneous prophylactic gastropexy in canine patients undergoing complete splenectomy","authors":"Olivia Harris","doi":"10.18849/ve.v6i4.443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PICO question \nIn dogs that have undergone a complete splenectomy, does performing a concurrent gastropexy decrease the risk of future gastric dilatation-volvulus (GDV) development when compared to not performing a concurrent gastropexy? \n  \nClinical bottom line \nCategory of research question \nRisk \nThe number and type of study designs reviewed \nFive papers were critically reviewed which included one retrospective case series, one retrospective case-control study, and three combined retrospective cohort and cross-sectional survey studies \nStrength of evidence \nWeak \nOutcomes reported \nIn dogs that have had a complete splenectomy, there is no conclusive evidence that prophylactic gastropexy decreases the risk of lifetime GDV development \nConclusion \nBased on the limited information available, it is difficult to conclude if prophylactic gastropexy should be recommended routinely at the time of complete splenectomy \n  \nHow to apply this evidence in practice \nThe application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources. \nKnowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care. \n  \n","PeriodicalId":257905,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Evidence","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v6i4.443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PICO question In dogs that have undergone a complete splenectomy, does performing a concurrent gastropexy decrease the risk of future gastric dilatation-volvulus (GDV) development when compared to not performing a concurrent gastropexy?   Clinical bottom line Category of research question Risk The number and type of study designs reviewed Five papers were critically reviewed which included one retrospective case series, one retrospective case-control study, and three combined retrospective cohort and cross-sectional survey studies Strength of evidence Weak Outcomes reported In dogs that have had a complete splenectomy, there is no conclusive evidence that prophylactic gastropexy decreases the risk of lifetime GDV development Conclusion Based on the limited information available, it is difficult to conclude if prophylactic gastropexy should be recommended routinely at the time of complete splenectomy   How to apply this evidence in practice The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources. Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目前的证据支持同时预防性胃灌胃术在犬病人接受完全脾切除术
PICO问题:在接受了完全脾切除术的狗中,与不进行胃固定术相比,同时进行胃固定术是否会降低未来胃扩张-扭转(GDV)发展的风险?临床底线研究问题类别风险研究设计的数量和类型综述了五篇论文,其中包括一篇回顾性病例系列研究,一篇回顾性病例对照研究,以及三篇回顾性队列和横断面调查联合研究证据强度报告的弱结果在完全脾切除术的狗中,目前尚无确凿证据表明预防性胃灌胃术能降低终生GDV发生的风险结论基于现有的有限信息,很难得出在全脾切除术时是否应常规推荐预防性胃灌胃术的结论。如何在实践中应用这一证据。个人的临床专业知识,病人的情况和业主的价值观,你工作的国家,地点或诊所,你面前的个案,治疗和资源的可用性。知识摘要是帮助加强或告知决策的资源。他们不会凌驾于从业者的责任或判断之上,去做对他们照顾的动物最好的事情。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Erratum to: Comparing the effectiveness of clomipramine and fluoxetine in dogs with anxiety-related behaviours In dogs with thoracolumbar disc extrusion does the use of acupuncture improve clinical recovery? Effectiveness of mesenchymal stem cell therapy in cats with chronic gingivostomatitis Effectiveness of mesenchymal stem cell therapy in cats with chronic gingivostomatitis Does local anaesthetic reduce pain in rubber ring castration of neonatal lambs?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1