Food Allergy Safety Assessment: An Introduction

I. Kimber, R. Dearman
{"title":"Food Allergy Safety Assessment: An Introduction","authors":"I. Kimber, R. Dearman","doi":"10.1080/08865140214380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Food allergy is a common, important, and probably increasing health problem that currently affects between 1% and 2% of adults and approximately 5% of children in North America and Europe (1). With an increasing interest in the development of novel foods, including those derived from genetically modified crops, some debate has developed about possible sources of adverse health effects and the need for appropriate safety assessment strategies (2–8). A major focus of attention has been the potential for allergenicity, and particularly consideration of whether novel proteins expressed in transgenic plants will be able to induce de novo sensitization and=or elicit allergic reactions in those who are already sensitized (9–14). The need for accurate assessments of the allergenic potential of novel proteins provides toxicologists with some significant, but nevertheless intriguing, challenges. One of the major issues is the basis for differences between proteins with respect to sensitization potential. Although something is known of the physicochemical features that characterize chemical allergens, the properties that confer on proteins the ability to cause allergic sensitization are less well defined (15). Clearly, a more detailed appreciation of the molecular, structural, and functional requirements for the effective induction of sensitization will facilitate new approaches to safety assessment in the future. In the meantime, however, a battery of experimental methods are available that collectively provide a sound basis for the identification and characterization of proteins that have an inherent potential to cause sensitization. The majority of these were included in a decision tree approach to allergenicity assessment that was recommended by a task force of the International Food Biotechnology Council and the Allergy and Immunology Institute of the International Life Sciences Institute (16). This represented the first coherent and systematic strategy for evaluating the sensitizing potential of novel","PeriodicalId":402874,"journal":{"name":"Comments on Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comments on Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08865140214380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Food allergy is a common, important, and probably increasing health problem that currently affects between 1% and 2% of adults and approximately 5% of children in North America and Europe (1). With an increasing interest in the development of novel foods, including those derived from genetically modified crops, some debate has developed about possible sources of adverse health effects and the need for appropriate safety assessment strategies (2–8). A major focus of attention has been the potential for allergenicity, and particularly consideration of whether novel proteins expressed in transgenic plants will be able to induce de novo sensitization and=or elicit allergic reactions in those who are already sensitized (9–14). The need for accurate assessments of the allergenic potential of novel proteins provides toxicologists with some significant, but nevertheless intriguing, challenges. One of the major issues is the basis for differences between proteins with respect to sensitization potential. Although something is known of the physicochemical features that characterize chemical allergens, the properties that confer on proteins the ability to cause allergic sensitization are less well defined (15). Clearly, a more detailed appreciation of the molecular, structural, and functional requirements for the effective induction of sensitization will facilitate new approaches to safety assessment in the future. In the meantime, however, a battery of experimental methods are available that collectively provide a sound basis for the identification and characterization of proteins that have an inherent potential to cause sensitization. The majority of these were included in a decision tree approach to allergenicity assessment that was recommended by a task force of the International Food Biotechnology Council and the Allergy and Immunology Institute of the International Life Sciences Institute (16). This represented the first coherent and systematic strategy for evaluating the sensitizing potential of novel
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
食物过敏安全评估简介
食物过敏是一种常见、重要且可能日益严重的健康问题,目前影响着北美和欧洲1%至2%的成年人和约5%的儿童(1)。随着人们对新型食品(包括转基因食品)开发的兴趣日益增加,一些关于不良健康影响的可能来源和适当的安全评估策略的必要性的争论已经展开(2-8)。一个主要的关注焦点是潜在的致敏性,特别是考虑转基因植物中表达的新蛋白是否能够诱导新生致敏和=或引起已经致敏的人的过敏反应(9-14)。对新蛋白致敏潜力的准确评估为毒理学家提供了一些重要的,但仍然有趣的挑战。其中一个主要问题是关于致敏电位的蛋白质之间的差异的基础。虽然我们对化学过敏原的理化特征有所了解,但赋予蛋白质引起过敏致敏能力的特性却不太清楚(15)。显然,对有效诱导致敏的分子、结构和功能要求的更详细的认识将促进未来安全性评估的新方法。然而,与此同时,一系列实验方法是可用的,它们共同为鉴定和表征具有固有致敏潜力的蛋白质提供了坚实的基础。其中大多数被纳入国际食品生物技术理事会和国际生命科学研究所的过敏和免疫学研究所的一个工作组推荐的致敏性评估决策树方法(16)。这代表了第一个连贯的和系统的策略来评估敏感的潜力的小说
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Overview: Biomarkers of Pollution in Aquatic Animals Current and Future Perspectives Using Biomarkers to Assess Pollution in Aquatic Ecosystems Global Analysis of Biomarker Responses in Aquatic Organisms Exposed to Contaminants Total Oxyradical Scavenging Capacity as an Index of Susceptibility to Oxidative Stress in Marine Organisms Annelids and Nematodes as Sentinels of Environmental Pollution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1