Empowerment and ‘Big Personal Data’: From Portability to Personal Agency

N. Anciaux, Célia Zolynski, Sébastien Chaudat, Riad Ladjel
{"title":"Empowerment and ‘Big Personal Data’: From Portability to Personal Agency","authors":"N. Anciaux, Célia Zolynski, Sébastien Chaudat, Riad Ladjel","doi":"10.54648/gplr2021003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The place of individuals and the control of their data have emerged as central issues in the European data protection regulation. The 'empowerment' of the individual has notably resulted in the recognition of a new prerogative for the individual: the right to the portability of personal data. The corollary of this new right is the design and deployment of technical platforms, commonly known as Personal Cloud, Personal Server or PIMS, allowing the individual to consolidate all his or her data in a single system managed under his or her control. On the strength of these technical and legal innovations, several questions arise: what forms of empowerment are targeted in practice? What are the appropriate conditions to guarantee the objective pursued? At the crossroads of these questions, one dimension appears to be insufficiently exploited: that of 'agentivity'. This article transposes this notion from the social sciences to the management of personal data, and opens up a new reading of the empowerment measures of Big Data functionalities on personal data.\nPersonal Data, Portability Right, GDPR, Data Governance Act, PIMS, PDMS, Personal Agency, Mutual Trust","PeriodicalId":127582,"journal":{"name":"Global Privacy Law Review","volume":"259 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Privacy Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/gplr2021003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The place of individuals and the control of their data have emerged as central issues in the European data protection regulation. The 'empowerment' of the individual has notably resulted in the recognition of a new prerogative for the individual: the right to the portability of personal data. The corollary of this new right is the design and deployment of technical platforms, commonly known as Personal Cloud, Personal Server or PIMS, allowing the individual to consolidate all his or her data in a single system managed under his or her control. On the strength of these technical and legal innovations, several questions arise: what forms of empowerment are targeted in practice? What are the appropriate conditions to guarantee the objective pursued? At the crossroads of these questions, one dimension appears to be insufficiently exploited: that of 'agentivity'. This article transposes this notion from the social sciences to the management of personal data, and opens up a new reading of the empowerment measures of Big Data functionalities on personal data. Personal Data, Portability Right, GDPR, Data Governance Act, PIMS, PDMS, Personal Agency, Mutual Trust
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
授权和“大个人数据”:从便携性到个人代理
个人的位置和对个人数据的控制已经成为欧洲数据保护条例的核心问题。对个人的“赋权”显著地导致了对个人新特权的承认:个人数据可移植性的权利。这种新权利的必然结果是技术平台的设计和部署,通常被称为个人云、个人服务器或PIMS,允许个人将他或她的所有数据整合到他或她控制下管理的单个系统中。在这些技术和法律创新的力量下,出现了几个问题:在实践中以何种形式的赋权为目标?什么是保证所追求目标的适当条件?在这些问题的十字路口,有一个维度似乎没有得到充分利用:“能动性”。本文将这一概念从社会科学转移到个人数据管理,并对大数据功能对个人数据的赋权措施进行了新的解读。个人数据,可移植性权利,GDPR,数据治理法案,PIMS, PDMS,个人代理,相互信任
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Key Privacy Concepts in the EU and Canada The Personal Data Under the GDPR: Concept, Elements, and Boundaries News: APAC Privacy News Collection of Personal Information in Canadian Law Case Note: Strengthening the Role of Google? Recent Developments in the Right to Be Forgotten Case Law of the CJEU (TU and RE v. Google LLC, C-460/20)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1