Exploring student and demonstrator perspectives of the teaching and learning provided by demonstrators during undergraduate laboratory practical sessions

Vicky Palumbo, Christopher Cammies
{"title":"Exploring student and demonstrator perspectives of the teaching and learning provided by demonstrators during undergraduate laboratory practical sessions","authors":"Vicky Palumbo, Christopher Cammies","doi":"10.31273/jppp.vol2.2022.1224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Graduate teaching assistants (GTAs) such as demonstrators are integral to higher education teaching. However, undergraduate student perceptions on the impact of demonstrators to their teaching and learning is understudied. Similarly, demonstrator perceptions on the quality and value of their teaching also remains largely unexplored. We addressed both students’ and demonstrators’ perceptions of demonstrator teaching and learning within undergraduate Biology practical sessions at a UK research intensive university. We combine quantitative and qualitative data to explore students’ ideas around where their learning and feedback comes from, and the effectiveness of demonstrators during their practical sessions. This was paired with analogous data from demonstrators derived from the same concepts, thereby helping to assess their dynamic. Most students considered demonstrators to be important for teaching and learning in the laboratory setting by delivering high quality pedagogy, creating a positive learning environment and by being their primary source of feedback. Conversely, a small number of students raised issues regarding demonstrator consistency and lack of knowledge when compared with a lecturer. Students largely considered demonstrators to have sufficient knowledge and to be more approachable than lecturers. Demonstrators also recognised their valuable contribution to teaching and learning and largely mirrored the ideas undergraduate students had about effective demonstrators. Many demonstrators believe they need to be allocated more paid time to fully prepare for teaching and maximise their potential. Finally, we reflect on lessons learnt from both students and demonstrators regarding how demonstrators can improve their teaching and how universities can support this. ","PeriodicalId":142586,"journal":{"name":"Journal of PGR Pedagogic Practice","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of PGR Pedagogic Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31273/jppp.vol2.2022.1224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Graduate teaching assistants (GTAs) such as demonstrators are integral to higher education teaching. However, undergraduate student perceptions on the impact of demonstrators to their teaching and learning is understudied. Similarly, demonstrator perceptions on the quality and value of their teaching also remains largely unexplored. We addressed both students’ and demonstrators’ perceptions of demonstrator teaching and learning within undergraduate Biology practical sessions at a UK research intensive university. We combine quantitative and qualitative data to explore students’ ideas around where their learning and feedback comes from, and the effectiveness of demonstrators during their practical sessions. This was paired with analogous data from demonstrators derived from the same concepts, thereby helping to assess their dynamic. Most students considered demonstrators to be important for teaching and learning in the laboratory setting by delivering high quality pedagogy, creating a positive learning environment and by being their primary source of feedback. Conversely, a small number of students raised issues regarding demonstrator consistency and lack of knowledge when compared with a lecturer. Students largely considered demonstrators to have sufficient knowledge and to be more approachable than lecturers. Demonstrators also recognised their valuable contribution to teaching and learning and largely mirrored the ideas undergraduate students had about effective demonstrators. Many demonstrators believe they need to be allocated more paid time to fully prepare for teaching and maximise their potential. Finally, we reflect on lessons learnt from both students and demonstrators regarding how demonstrators can improve their teaching and how universities can support this. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索学生和演示者在本科实验室实践课程中提供的教学和学习的观点
研究生助教是高等教育教学的重要组成部分。然而,大学生对示威者对其教学和学习的影响的看法尚未得到充分研究。同样,学生对教学质量和价值的看法在很大程度上仍未得到探索。在英国一所研究型大学的本科生物学实践课程中,我们讨论了学生和示威者对示范教学和学习的看法。我们结合定量和定性数据来探索学生的想法,了解他们的学习和反馈来自哪里,以及在实践课程中演示的有效性。这与来自相同概念的示威者的类似数据配对,从而有助于评估其动态。大多数学生认为,通过提供高质量的教学方法,创造积极的学习环境,并成为他们反馈的主要来源,示范对实验室环境中的教学和学习很重要。相反,与讲师相比,少数学生提出了关于演示者一致性和缺乏知识的问题。学生们普遍认为示威者拥有足够的知识,比讲师更平易近人。示威者也认识到他们对教学和学习的宝贵贡献,这在很大程度上反映了本科生对有效示威者的看法。许多示威者认为,他们需要被分配更多的带薪时间来充分准备教学,并最大限度地发挥他们的潜力。最后,我们反思了从学生和示威者那里学到的经验教训,包括示威者如何改善教学,以及大学如何支持这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Navigating Challenges in Postgraduate Pedagogy: An EDI Consideration to Preparing, Designing, and Delivering Teaching by PGRs From Learning to Teaching: Incorporating Cultural Familiarity to Enhance GTA Support for International Students' Learning Exploring Inclusive Practices in Schools: A Systems Thinking Perspective Creating a third cultural space: What role does intercultural communication play in PGR teaching? Unveiling the Crossroads: Reflections on Teaching Chinese Master’s Students in Chemical Engineering Labs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1