LTLf Synthesis on Probabilistic Systems

Andrew M. Wells, Morteza Lahijanian, L. Kavraki, Moshe Y. Vardi
{"title":"LTLf Synthesis on Probabilistic Systems","authors":"Andrew M. Wells, Morteza Lahijanian, L. Kavraki, Moshe Y. Vardi","doi":"10.4204/EPTCS.326.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many systems are naturally modeled as Markov Decision Processes (MDPs), combining probabilities and strategic actions. Given a model of a system as an MDP and some logical specification of system behavior, the goal of synthesis is to find a policy that maximizes the probability of achieving this behavior. A popular choice for defining behaviors is Linear Temporal Logic (LTL). Policy synthesis on MDPs for properties specified in LTL has been well studied. LTL, however, is defined over infinite traces, while many properties of interest are inherently finite. Linear Temporal Logic over finite traces (LTLf) has been used to express such properties, but no tools exist to solve policy synthesis for MDP behaviors given finite-trace properties. We present two algorithms for solving this synthesis problem: the first via reduction of LTLf to LTL and the second using native tools for LTLf. We compare the scalability of these two approaches for synthesis and show that the native approach offers better scalability compared to existing automaton generation tools for LTL.","PeriodicalId":104855,"journal":{"name":"International Symposium on Games, Automata, Logics and Formal Verification","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Symposium on Games, Automata, Logics and Formal Verification","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.326.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Many systems are naturally modeled as Markov Decision Processes (MDPs), combining probabilities and strategic actions. Given a model of a system as an MDP and some logical specification of system behavior, the goal of synthesis is to find a policy that maximizes the probability of achieving this behavior. A popular choice for defining behaviors is Linear Temporal Logic (LTL). Policy synthesis on MDPs for properties specified in LTL has been well studied. LTL, however, is defined over infinite traces, while many properties of interest are inherently finite. Linear Temporal Logic over finite traces (LTLf) has been used to express such properties, but no tools exist to solve policy synthesis for MDP behaviors given finite-trace properties. We present two algorithms for solving this synthesis problem: the first via reduction of LTLf to LTL and the second using native tools for LTLf. We compare the scalability of these two approaches for synthesis and show that the native approach offers better scalability compared to existing automaton generation tools for LTL.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
概率系统的LTLf综合
许多系统自然地被建模为马尔可夫决策过程(mdp),结合了概率和战略行动。给定一个作为MDP的系统模型和一些系统行为的逻辑规范,综合的目标是找到一个策略,使实现该行为的概率最大化。定义行为的常用选择是线性时序逻辑(LTL)。针对LTL中指定属性的mdp策略综合已经得到了很好的研究。然而,LTL是在无限轨迹上定义的,而我们感兴趣的许多属性本质上是有限的。有限轨迹上的线性时间逻辑(LTLf)已用于表达这些属性,但是没有工具可以解决给定有限轨迹属性的MDP行为的策略综合问题。我们提出了两种算法来解决这个综合问题:第一种是通过将LTLf减少到LTL,第二种是使用LTLf的本地工具。我们比较了这两种合成方法的可伸缩性,并表明与现有的LTL自动生成工具相比,本机方法提供了更好的可伸缩性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Complexity through Translations for Modal Logic with Recursion Capturing Bisimulation-Invariant Exponential-Time Complexity Classes Schema-Based Automata Determinization Parametric Interval Temporal Logic over Infinite Words Characterizing the Decidability of Finite State Automata Team Games with Communication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1