An Analysis of Passengers’ Safety Risk at the Infrastructure Improvement Project of Railway Station

Nanda Ahda Imron, D. Setiawan, Ali Oktavian Handoko, Erifendi Churniawan, Handoko Handoko, A. Iswanto
{"title":"An Analysis of Passengers’ Safety Risk at the Infrastructure Improvement Project of Railway Station","authors":"Nanda Ahda Imron, D. Setiawan, Ali Oktavian Handoko, Erifendi Churniawan, Handoko Handoko, A. Iswanto","doi":"10.37367/jrtt.v1i2.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Constructing the elevated track at the Manggarai Railway Station has risk which potentially endangers the passengers’ safety due to its construction process is carried out within passengers’ activities around the railway station. This research aims to identify the hazard and risks, analyze the level and control the risk. Moreover, this study also aims to arrange the priority of serial alternative solutions regarding the handling the risk within the construction process of elevated track. This study used methods as follows: Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment, And Risk Control (HIRARC) and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). In addition, data triangulation was also done by involving three respondents in keeping with to ensure the validity. The analysis of HIRARC generated 11 hazards and risks namely 6 are classified into extreme risks, 4 are rated high risk and 1 is categorized as medium risk. The method of AHP is used to analyze the alternative ways of handling the risks and to find out the priorities above some alternative ways of handling the risks. The sequence of the alternative ways of handling the risks based on the top priority is as follows: (1) first priority by applying the switch over 5, (2) second priority by adding the KLB feeder, (3) third priority by increasing the service facility.","PeriodicalId":268981,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Railway Transportation and Technology","volume":"150 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Railway Transportation and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37367/jrtt.v1i2.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Constructing the elevated track at the Manggarai Railway Station has risk which potentially endangers the passengers’ safety due to its construction process is carried out within passengers’ activities around the railway station. This research aims to identify the hazard and risks, analyze the level and control the risk. Moreover, this study also aims to arrange the priority of serial alternative solutions regarding the handling the risk within the construction process of elevated track. This study used methods as follows: Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment, And Risk Control (HIRARC) and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). In addition, data triangulation was also done by involving three respondents in keeping with to ensure the validity. The analysis of HIRARC generated 11 hazards and risks namely 6 are classified into extreme risks, 4 are rated high risk and 1 is categorized as medium risk. The method of AHP is used to analyze the alternative ways of handling the risks and to find out the priorities above some alternative ways of handling the risks. The sequence of the alternative ways of handling the risks based on the top priority is as follows: (1) first priority by applying the switch over 5, (2) second priority by adding the KLB feeder, (3) third priority by increasing the service facility.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
铁路车站基础设施改造工程中乘客安全风险分析
Manggarai火车站高架轨道的施工过程是在火车站周围的乘客活动范围内进行的,存在着潜在的乘客安全风险。本研究旨在识别危害和风险,分析风险水平并控制风险。此外,本研究还旨在对高架轨道施工过程中风险处理的系列备选方案进行优先排序。本研究采用了危害识别、风险评估和风险控制(HIRARC)和层次分析法(AHP)。此外,为了保证数据的有效性,我们还对数据进行了三角剖分,由三个被调查者参与。HIRARC分析产生了11种危害和风险,其中6种为极端风险,4种为高风险,1种为中等风险。运用层次分析法对风险处理方案进行分析,找出风险处理方案的优先级。根据最高优先级,处理风险的备选方法顺序如下:(1)第一优先级是应用5切换,(2)第二优先级是增加KLB馈线,(3)第三优先级是增加服务设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Facility Services at Kepatang Train Station Based on User and Community Interest Geometry Design of Railway Track for High-Speed Railways Bandung-Cirebon KM 00+000 - KM 33+850 Axle Counter Grounding System on The PPI Madiun Railway Using the Wenner Method Landslide Susceptibility Assessment of a Railway Based on GIS Application Study on Mechanical Properties of Pineapple Leaf-Glass Fiber Hybrid Composites for Car Body Applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1