Do we react in the same manner?: comparing GSR patterns across scenarios

Chen Wang, Pablo César
{"title":"Do we react in the same manner?: comparing GSR patterns across scenarios","authors":"Chen Wang, Pablo César","doi":"10.1145/2639189.2639201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Is the physiological response from participants different between a lab experiment and a field study? In this paper, we exhaustively compare the GSR (galvanic skin response) patterns between two different scenarios. The first one was conducted in a theatre during a performance, while the second one in a laboratory during a video watching session. Questionnaires, interviews, and video recordings helped us to interpret sensor patterns, and to map them to user engagement. When comparing the GSR responses, we found a strong positive correlation between all engaged users of the two scenarios. Interestingly, such correlation was not present between the responses of non-engaged users. These results show the homogeneity of positive responses across scenarios, when compared to the variability of negative ones. The results corroborate as well that sensor data results obtained in lab studies cannot be easily generalized to real-world situations.","PeriodicalId":354301,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2639189.2639201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Is the physiological response from participants different between a lab experiment and a field study? In this paper, we exhaustively compare the GSR (galvanic skin response) patterns between two different scenarios. The first one was conducted in a theatre during a performance, while the second one in a laboratory during a video watching session. Questionnaires, interviews, and video recordings helped us to interpret sensor patterns, and to map them to user engagement. When comparing the GSR responses, we found a strong positive correlation between all engaged users of the two scenarios. Interestingly, such correlation was not present between the responses of non-engaged users. These results show the homogeneity of positive responses across scenarios, when compared to the variability of negative ones. The results corroborate as well that sensor data results obtained in lab studies cannot be easily generalized to real-world situations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们的反应是一样的吗?:比较不同场景下的GSR模式
在实验室实验和实地研究中,参与者的生理反应不同吗?在本文中,我们详尽地比较了两种不同情况下的皮肤电反应模式。第一个实验是在剧院表演期间进行的,而第二个实验是在实验室观看视频期间进行的。问卷调查、访谈和视频记录帮助我们解读传感器模式,并将其映射到用户参与度。当比较GSR反应时,我们发现两种场景下所有参与用户之间存在强烈的正相关。有趣的是,这种相关性在非参与用户的反应中并不存在。这些结果表明,与消极反应的可变性相比,积极反应在不同情景下具有同质性。结果也证实,在实验室研究中获得的传感器数据结果不容易推广到现实世界的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Harambee: a novel usability evaluation method for low-end users in Kenya Rights to remember?: how copyrights complicate media design Human work interaction design for pervasive and smart workplaces Exploring history: a mobile inclusive virtual tourist guide Beyond the switch: explicit and implicit interaction with light
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1