The Scottish Parliament, the Supreme Court, and an Independence Referendum?

Matthew Psycharis, A. Mills
{"title":"The Scottish Parliament, the Supreme Court, and an Independence Referendum?","authors":"Matthew Psycharis, A. Mills","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2022.2167419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1. The result of the 2014 referendum on Scottish independence was a – fairly narrow – rejection of the proposal for Scotland becoming independent at that time. However, there remained a high level of support for independence. As is well-known, whilst the UK as a whole voted to leave the EU in the 2016 referendum, a majority of voters in Scotland voted to remain in the EU. As the House of Lords Constitution Select Committee has stated, ‘[t]his prompted calls for a second independence referendum by the Scottish Government, which were rejected by the UK Government on the grounds that this was not a priority during the implementation of Brexit and the response to COVID-19’.","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"3 11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judicial Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2022.2167419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

1. The result of the 2014 referendum on Scottish independence was a – fairly narrow – rejection of the proposal for Scotland becoming independent at that time. However, there remained a high level of support for independence. As is well-known, whilst the UK as a whole voted to leave the EU in the 2016 referendum, a majority of voters in Scotland voted to remain in the EU. As the House of Lords Constitution Select Committee has stated, ‘[t]his prompted calls for a second independence referendum by the Scottish Government, which were rejected by the UK Government on the grounds that this was not a priority during the implementation of Brexit and the response to COVID-19’.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
苏格兰议会、最高法院和独立公投?
1. 2014年苏格兰独立公投的结果是——相当微弱的——否决了苏格兰独立的提议。然而,仍然有很多人支持独立。众所周知,在2016年的公投中,英国作为一个整体选择离开欧盟,而苏格兰的大多数选民却选择留在欧盟。正如上议院宪法特别委员会所说,“这促使苏格兰政府呼吁举行第二次独立公投,但被英国政府拒绝,理由是这不是实施英国脱欧和应对COVID-19期间的优先事项。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Article 2 and Standards of Proof in Inquests: Unintelligible, Unclear, and Unpredictable? Of Codes and Common Law: The Approach to Apparent Bias in Local Government Committees Competing ‘Clear and Unambiguous’ Constructions: Darwall v Dartmoor National Park Authority [2023] EWCA Civ 927 and the Interpretation of Private Acts of Parliament The Curious Case of Boris’ Bishop: Did the First Catholic Prime Minister Fall Foul of s 18 of the Roman Catholic Relief Act 1829? Information Law and Automated Governance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1