External examination in France and Germany: recognition of informal learning from an institutional economic perspective

Silvia Annen, Daniel Schreiber
{"title":"External examination in France and Germany: recognition of informal learning from an institutional economic perspective","authors":"Silvia Annen, Daniel Schreiber","doi":"10.1504/IJIOME.2010.033552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Against the background of increasing importance of informal learning, in this paper, the national approaches towards the recognition of informal acquired competences in France Validation des Acquis de l'Experience (VAE) and Germany (external examination) are compared. As a theoretical and conceptual access, the new institutional economics is chosen. The context of the recognition of the problems concerning the transparency of the competences to be recognised arises as well, concerning the transparency of the according methods. In terms of the principal agent theory these problems can be seen as information asymmetries. To reduce them, stakeholders can choose methods of either signalling or screening. Therefore, both national approaches are analysed concerning the methods of the stakeholders. Furthermore, central similarities and differences are extracted.","PeriodicalId":193538,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Information and Operations Management Education","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Information and Operations Management Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIOME.2010.033552","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Against the background of increasing importance of informal learning, in this paper, the national approaches towards the recognition of informal acquired competences in France Validation des Acquis de l'Experience (VAE) and Germany (external examination) are compared. As a theoretical and conceptual access, the new institutional economics is chosen. The context of the recognition of the problems concerning the transparency of the competences to be recognised arises as well, concerning the transparency of the according methods. In terms of the principal agent theory these problems can be seen as information asymmetries. To reduce them, stakeholders can choose methods of either signalling or screening. Therefore, both national approaches are analysed concerning the methods of the stakeholders. Furthermore, central similarities and differences are extracted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法国和德国的外部考试:从制度经济学角度对非正式学习的认可
在非正式学习日益重要的背景下,本文比较了法国的“经验验证”(Validation des Acquis de l’experience, VAE)和德国的“外部考试”(external examination)两国在非正式获得性能力认可方面的做法。选择新制度经济学作为理论和概念途径。认识到所承认的能力的透明度问题的背景,也涉及到相应方法的透明度问题。根据委托代理理论,这些问题可以看作是信息不对称。为了减少它们,利益相关者可以选择信号或筛选的方法。因此,从利益相关者的方法角度分析了两种国家方法。进一步提取中心异同点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lean production teaching methods and learning assessment: a literature review A framework for teaching an undergraduate data analytics class An informal approach to management development at small and medium-sized manufacturing companies Computer self-efficacy in global contexts: appraising Chinese and Indian non-specialists' attitudes to common and advanced computer tasks Role of learning style preferences and interactive response systems on student learning outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1