{"title":"External examination in France and Germany: recognition of informal learning from an institutional economic perspective","authors":"Silvia Annen, Daniel Schreiber","doi":"10.1504/IJIOME.2010.033552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Against the background of increasing importance of informal learning, in this paper, the national approaches towards the recognition of informal acquired competences in France Validation des Acquis de l'Experience (VAE) and Germany (external examination) are compared. As a theoretical and conceptual access, the new institutional economics is chosen. The context of the recognition of the problems concerning the transparency of the competences to be recognised arises as well, concerning the transparency of the according methods. In terms of the principal agent theory these problems can be seen as information asymmetries. To reduce them, stakeholders can choose methods of either signalling or screening. Therefore, both national approaches are analysed concerning the methods of the stakeholders. Furthermore, central similarities and differences are extracted.","PeriodicalId":193538,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Information and Operations Management Education","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Information and Operations Management Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIOME.2010.033552","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Against the background of increasing importance of informal learning, in this paper, the national approaches towards the recognition of informal acquired competences in France Validation des Acquis de l'Experience (VAE) and Germany (external examination) are compared. As a theoretical and conceptual access, the new institutional economics is chosen. The context of the recognition of the problems concerning the transparency of the competences to be recognised arises as well, concerning the transparency of the according methods. In terms of the principal agent theory these problems can be seen as information asymmetries. To reduce them, stakeholders can choose methods of either signalling or screening. Therefore, both national approaches are analysed concerning the methods of the stakeholders. Furthermore, central similarities and differences are extracted.
在非正式学习日益重要的背景下,本文比较了法国的“经验验证”(Validation des Acquis de l’experience, VAE)和德国的“外部考试”(external examination)两国在非正式获得性能力认可方面的做法。选择新制度经济学作为理论和概念途径。认识到所承认的能力的透明度问题的背景,也涉及到相应方法的透明度问题。根据委托代理理论,这些问题可以看作是信息不对称。为了减少它们,利益相关者可以选择信号或筛选的方法。因此,从利益相关者的方法角度分析了两种国家方法。进一步提取中心异同点。