Life Cycle Assessment of Different Marine Fuel Types and Powertrain Configurations for Financial and Environmental Impact Assessment in Shipping

H. Taghavifar, L. Perera
{"title":"Life Cycle Assessment of Different Marine Fuel Types and Powertrain Configurations for Financial and Environmental Impact Assessment in Shipping","authors":"H. Taghavifar, L. Perera","doi":"10.1115/omae2022-78774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The fuel type selection according to optimal pathway from extraction of a raw material (feedstock) to its processing to transportation and finally its use in marine engines (well to wheel) based on the cost and emission criteria is the main motivation factor to conduct the current investigation. The undertaken procedure has been customized based on the available data (ship/bunker route and mileage, the ship powertrain system, etc.) of the shipping industry under the SeaTech H2020 project (seatech2020.eu). The selected modeling platform is utilized for the life cycle assessment of three potential fuels of diesel, methanol, and liquefied natural gas (LNG). Different fuel production pathways and powertrain dual-fuel technologies have been taken into account as the main variables, while the subsidiary factors such as transportation parameters (fuel economy and Avg. speed) are included in the calculations. The economic aspect and emission reduction trade-off for various scenarios are conducted to introduce the optimal solution based on the stakeholder interest in the shipping industry. The study also considers the fuel transport to the respective ports for a selected vessel from diverse fuel export locations and travelled routes according to datasets available for the same project. The results provide a guideline to the shipping industry on selecting possible conventional/renewable fuel resources to use in marine engines with emission content during each adopted pathway, where the respective subsequent expenditure per 1 MJ of each fuel sample as the functional unit has been evaluated.","PeriodicalId":408227,"journal":{"name":"Volume 5A: Ocean Engineering","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 5A: Ocean Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/omae2022-78774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The fuel type selection according to optimal pathway from extraction of a raw material (feedstock) to its processing to transportation and finally its use in marine engines (well to wheel) based on the cost and emission criteria is the main motivation factor to conduct the current investigation. The undertaken procedure has been customized based on the available data (ship/bunker route and mileage, the ship powertrain system, etc.) of the shipping industry under the SeaTech H2020 project (seatech2020.eu). The selected modeling platform is utilized for the life cycle assessment of three potential fuels of diesel, methanol, and liquefied natural gas (LNG). Different fuel production pathways and powertrain dual-fuel technologies have been taken into account as the main variables, while the subsidiary factors such as transportation parameters (fuel economy and Avg. speed) are included in the calculations. The economic aspect and emission reduction trade-off for various scenarios are conducted to introduce the optimal solution based on the stakeholder interest in the shipping industry. The study also considers the fuel transport to the respective ports for a selected vessel from diverse fuel export locations and travelled routes according to datasets available for the same project. The results provide a guideline to the shipping industry on selecting possible conventional/renewable fuel resources to use in marine engines with emission content during each adopted pathway, where the respective subsequent expenditure per 1 MJ of each fuel sample as the functional unit has been evaluated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
船舶财务和环境影响评估中不同船用燃料类型和动力系统配置的生命周期评估
根据成本和排放标准,从原料(原料)的提取到加工到运输,最后在船用发动机(从油井到车轮)中使用的最佳路径选择燃料类型是进行当前研究的主要动机因素。在SeaTech H2020项目(seatech2020.eu)下,根据航运业的可用数据(船舶/燃料舱路线和里程,船舶动力系统等)定制了所承担的程序。所选择的建模平台用于柴油、甲醇和液化天然气(LNG)三种潜在燃料的生命周期评估。考虑了不同的燃料生产途径和动力系统双燃料技术作为主要变量,同时考虑了运输参数(燃油经济性和平均速度)等辅助因素。通过对不同情景下的经济方面和减排权衡,引入基于航运业利益相关者利益的最优解决方案。根据同一项目的现有数据集,该研究还考虑了从不同燃料出口地点和旅行路线的选定船舶到各自港口的燃料运输。研究结果为航运业选择可能的常规/可再生燃料资源以用于船舶发动机提供了指导,其中每种燃料样品作为功能单位的每1mj各自的后续支出已被评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Multiple Hinged Floaters – An Experimental Study on Hydrodynamic Responses in Waves Further Investigation on Wave Impact Loads on the Underside of a 2D Flat-Bottomed Model A Single Cavitation Bubble Induced Damage Use of a Linear Discretization of the Velocity Potential in the Frequency-Domain Linear Potential Flow Theory Application of Dipole Damper Panels in Modelling Gap Resonance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1