CONTRASTING ACTIVITY TIMES BETWEEN RACCOONS (PROCYON LOTOR) AND VIRGINIA OPOSSUMS (DIDELPHIS VIRGINIANA) IN URBAN GREEN SPACES

Destiny M. Mims, Sophie A Yasuda, M. J. Jordan
{"title":"CONTRASTING ACTIVITY TIMES BETWEEN RACCOONS (PROCYON LOTOR) AND VIRGINIA OPOSSUMS (DIDELPHIS VIRGINIANA) IN URBAN GREEN SPACES","authors":"Destiny M. Mims, Sophie A Yasuda, M. J. Jordan","doi":"10.1898/1051-1733-103.1.63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract As urbanization increases, impacts on urban wildlife behavior are becoming more apparent. Using camera traps, we compared activity times of Raccoons (Procyon lotor) with those of Virginia Opossums (Didelphis virginiana) in natural areas of Seattle, Washington. Previous studies found that Virginia Opossums and Raccoons are significantly more active at night than at any other time. However, these studies occurred exclusively in forested or agricultural landscapes. We deployed motion-triggered camera traps in greenspaces of Seattle to test the hypothesis that Raccoons and Virginia Opossums are both primarily active at night in an urban environment. Our results demonstrated a statistically significant difference in activity time distributions between the species. Virginia Opossums were exclusively nocturnal, whereas Raccoons allocated their activity between nocturnal and crepuscular periods. This study provides a snapshot of mesopredator behavior in an environment heavily influenced by humans and informs the effective management of Raccoons in urban areas.","PeriodicalId":142406,"journal":{"name":"Northwestern Naturalist","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northwestern Naturalist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1898/1051-1733-103.1.63","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract As urbanization increases, impacts on urban wildlife behavior are becoming more apparent. Using camera traps, we compared activity times of Raccoons (Procyon lotor) with those of Virginia Opossums (Didelphis virginiana) in natural areas of Seattle, Washington. Previous studies found that Virginia Opossums and Raccoons are significantly more active at night than at any other time. However, these studies occurred exclusively in forested or agricultural landscapes. We deployed motion-triggered camera traps in greenspaces of Seattle to test the hypothesis that Raccoons and Virginia Opossums are both primarily active at night in an urban environment. Our results demonstrated a statistically significant difference in activity time distributions between the species. Virginia Opossums were exclusively nocturnal, whereas Raccoons allocated their activity between nocturnal and crepuscular periods. This study provides a snapshot of mesopredator behavior in an environment heavily influenced by humans and informs the effective management of Raccoons in urban areas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对比浣熊和弗吉尼亚负鼠在城市绿地上的活动时间
随着城市化进程的加快,对城市野生动物行为的影响越来越明显。在华盛顿州西雅图的自然区域,我们使用相机陷阱比较了浣熊(Procyon lotor)和弗吉尼亚负鼠(Didelphis Virginia)的活动时间。以前的研究发现,弗吉尼亚负鼠和浣熊在晚上比其他任何时候都要活跃得多。然而,这些研究只在森林或农业景观中进行。我们在西雅图的绿地中部署了动作触发相机陷阱,以测试浣熊和弗吉尼亚负鼠在城市环境中主要在夜间活动的假设。我们的研究结果表明,物种之间的活动时间分布具有统计学上的显著差异。弗吉尼亚负鼠只在夜间活动,而浣熊则在夜间和黄昏之间活动。本研究提供了在受人类严重影响的环境中中捕食者行为的快照,并为城市地区浣熊的有效管理提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
AMERICAN AVOCETS AT COOKING LAKE, ALBERTA, 2009–2023, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO LARGE AGGREGATION SIZE, LOW REPRODUCTION RATE, LATE MIGRATION DEPARTURE, AND EFFECTIVE PREDATOR AVOIDANCE MARINE MAMMAL AND MARINE BIRD SURVEYS DURING THE WINDFLOAT PACIFIC OFFSHORE WIND PROJECT NEAR COOS BAY, OREGON, 2014 AND 2015 INDEX TO VOLUME 104 LIFETIME MEMBERS OF THE SOCIETY FOR NORTHWESTERN VERTEBRATE BIOLOGY REVIEWERS FOR VOLUME 104
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1