Reliability Estimators for Classification by Decomposition Method: Experiments in the Medical Domain

P. Soda, G. Iannello
{"title":"Reliability Estimators for Classification by Decomposition Method: Experiments in the Medical Domain","authors":"P. Soda, G. Iannello","doi":"10.1109/CBMS.2008.142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The performance of a classification system is sometimes unsatisfactory for the needs of real applications. In these cases, the measure of classification reliability should be useful since it takes into account the many issues that influence the achievement of satisfactory results. The most common choice for confidence evaluation consists in using the confusion matrix estimated during the learning phase. As a consequence, the same reliability value is associated with every decision attributing a sample to the same class. In this respect, this paper proposes and compares three different reliability estimators of each classification act of classification systems that belong to the one-per-class framework. They are based on the reliabilities provided by each dichotomizer and are independent of the binary module design. Their performance have been assessed and ranked on private and public medical datasets, showing that one of the estimators outperforms the others.","PeriodicalId":377855,"journal":{"name":"2008 21st IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems","volume":"425 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 21st IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CBMS.2008.142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The performance of a classification system is sometimes unsatisfactory for the needs of real applications. In these cases, the measure of classification reliability should be useful since it takes into account the many issues that influence the achievement of satisfactory results. The most common choice for confidence evaluation consists in using the confusion matrix estimated during the learning phase. As a consequence, the same reliability value is associated with every decision attributing a sample to the same class. In this respect, this paper proposes and compares three different reliability estimators of each classification act of classification systems that belong to the one-per-class framework. They are based on the reliabilities provided by each dichotomizer and are independent of the binary module design. Their performance have been assessed and ranked on private and public medical datasets, showing that one of the estimators outperforms the others.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于分解方法的分类可靠性估计:医学领域的实验
分类系统的性能有时不能满足实际应用的需要。在这些情况下,分类可靠性的度量应该是有用的,因为它考虑到影响取得令人满意的结果的许多问题。置信度评估最常见的选择是使用在学习阶段估计的混淆矩阵。因此,相同的可靠性值与将样本归为同一类的每个决策相关联。在这方面,本文提出并比较了属于一个类别框架的分类系统的每个分类行为的三种不同的可靠性估计。它们基于每个二分器提供的可靠性,并且独立于二进制模块设计。他们的表现已经在私人和公共医疗数据集上进行了评估和排名,表明其中一个估计器优于其他估计器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Decision Support for Alzheimer's Patients in Smart Homes A Telemedicine Network Using Secure Techniques and Intelligent User Access Control MapFace - An Editor for MetaMap Transfer (MMTx) Asynchronous Data Replication: A National Integration Strategy for Databases on Telemedicine Network Sentiment in Science - A Case Study of CBMS Contributions in Years 2003 to 2007
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1