Scalable consistency checking between diagrams - the VIEWINTEGRA approach

Alexander Egyed
{"title":"Scalable consistency checking between diagrams - the VIEWINTEGRA approach","authors":"Alexander Egyed","doi":"10.1109/ASE.2001.989835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Unified Modeling Language (UML) supports a wide range of diagrams for modeling software development concerns. UML diagrams are independent but connected; their meta-model describes them under a common roof. Despite the advances of UML, we found that the problem of ensuring consistency between UML diagrams has not been solved. We have developed an approach for automated consistency checking, called VIEWINTEGRA.. Our approach provides excellent support for active (preventive) and passive (detective) consistency checking. We make use of consistent transformation to translate diagrams into interpretations and we use consistency comparison to compare those interpretations to other diagrams. Our approach was applied to a number of applications where we found the separation of transformation and comparison to be highly beneficial in addressing consistency-checking scalability and usability issues. The paper introduces our UML-based transformation framework, discusses how it aids comparison, and demonstrates how it improves consistency checking.","PeriodicalId":433615,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 16th Annual International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2001)","volume":"213 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"85","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 16th Annual International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2001)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASE.2001.989835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 85

Abstract

The Unified Modeling Language (UML) supports a wide range of diagrams for modeling software development concerns. UML diagrams are independent but connected; their meta-model describes them under a common roof. Despite the advances of UML, we found that the problem of ensuring consistency between UML diagrams has not been solved. We have developed an approach for automated consistency checking, called VIEWINTEGRA.. Our approach provides excellent support for active (preventive) and passive (detective) consistency checking. We make use of consistent transformation to translate diagrams into interpretations and we use consistency comparison to compare those interpretations to other diagrams. Our approach was applied to a number of applications where we found the separation of transformation and comparison to be highly beneficial in addressing consistency-checking scalability and usability issues. The paper introduces our UML-based transformation framework, discusses how it aids comparison, and demonstrates how it improves consistency checking.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
图之间可伸缩的一致性检查- VIEWINTEGRA方法
统一建模语言(UML)支持广泛的图,用于对软件开发问题进行建模。UML图是独立但又相互联系的;它们的元模型在同一个屋檐下描述它们。尽管UML取得了进步,但是我们发现确保UML图之间一致性的问题还没有得到解决。我们已经开发了一种自动一致性检查的方法,称为VIEWINTEGRA。我们的方法为主动(预防性)和被动(检测性)一致性检查提供了出色的支持。我们使用一致性转换将图转换为解释,我们使用一致性比较将这些解释与其他图进行比较。我们的方法被应用到许多应用程序中,在这些应用程序中,我们发现转换和比较的分离在解决一致性检查、可伸缩性和可用性问题方面非常有益。本文介绍了我们基于uml的转换框架,讨论了它如何帮助比较,并演示了它如何改进一致性检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Automatic verification of Java design patterns Program execution based module cohesion measurement Test purposes: adapting the notion of specification to testing Composition and refinement of behavioral specifications Generation of distributed system test-beds from high-level software architecture descriptions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1