The Utility of Biomarkers in Diagnosing and Predicting Outcomes in Acute Mesenteric Ischemia

C. Pîrvu, F. Bratosin, C. Nica, D. Cȃrţu, Patrascu Ștefan, V. Șurlin, Konstantions Sapalidis, E. Georgescu, I. Georgescu, S. Pantea
{"title":"The Utility of Biomarkers in Diagnosing and Predicting Outcomes in Acute Mesenteric Ischemia","authors":"C. Pîrvu, F. Bratosin, C. Nica, D. Cȃrţu, Patrascu Ștefan, V. Șurlin, Konstantions Sapalidis, E. Georgescu, I. Georgescu, S. Pantea","doi":"10.7438/jsurg.2021.02.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Acute intestinal ischemia stands as the most lethal acute condition encountered by general\nsurgeons and one of the deadliest pathologies in medicine triggered by thromboembolic events. The patients’\nsurvival decreases dramatically to a lower than 30% rate when diagnosed after 24 hours, thus early diagnosis\nwith proper surgical or vascular intervention is mandatory. This study aims to determine the utility of biomarkers\nand routine blood tests in assessing the severity and mortality risk for patients with acute mesenteric ischemia.\nMethods: The study was developed on a prospective cross-sectional design over a period of five years, finding a\ntotal of 147 patients who underwent emergency surgery after a high suspicion of acute mesenteric ischemia. The\navailable biomarkers used in our Clinic comprised a complete blood count, total bilirubin, CK, CK-MB, LDH, AST,\nALT, amylase, and cholinesterase. Results: The leukocyte count (OR=1.105), hemoglobin (OR=3.912), LDH\n(OR=1.144), NLR (OR=1.154), and LLR (OR=1.286) were all independent and significant risk factors for AMI\ndiagnosis. These covariates proved a good and reliable tool for diagnosing AMI with a 75.3% predicted\nprobability. Conclusion: The prediction tool proved reliable, although it should only be considered in the clinical\ncontext where the surgeon suspects a case of acute mesenteric ischemia. The proposed model should be further\ninvestigated and validated in larger studies.","PeriodicalId":385372,"journal":{"name":"Jurnalul de Chirurgie","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnalul de Chirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7438/jsurg.2021.02.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute intestinal ischemia stands as the most lethal acute condition encountered by general surgeons and one of the deadliest pathologies in medicine triggered by thromboembolic events. The patients’ survival decreases dramatically to a lower than 30% rate when diagnosed after 24 hours, thus early diagnosis with proper surgical or vascular intervention is mandatory. This study aims to determine the utility of biomarkers and routine blood tests in assessing the severity and mortality risk for patients with acute mesenteric ischemia. Methods: The study was developed on a prospective cross-sectional design over a period of five years, finding a total of 147 patients who underwent emergency surgery after a high suspicion of acute mesenteric ischemia. The available biomarkers used in our Clinic comprised a complete blood count, total bilirubin, CK, CK-MB, LDH, AST, ALT, amylase, and cholinesterase. Results: The leukocyte count (OR=1.105), hemoglobin (OR=3.912), LDH (OR=1.144), NLR (OR=1.154), and LLR (OR=1.286) were all independent and significant risk factors for AMI diagnosis. These covariates proved a good and reliable tool for diagnosing AMI with a 75.3% predicted probability. Conclusion: The prediction tool proved reliable, although it should only be considered in the clinical context where the surgeon suspects a case of acute mesenteric ischemia. The proposed model should be further investigated and validated in larger studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物标志物在急性肠系膜缺血诊断和预后预测中的应用
背景:急性肠缺血是普通外科医生遇到的最致命的急性疾病,也是由血栓栓塞事件引发的最致命的医学病理之一。24小时后确诊,患者生存率显著下降至30%以下,因此早期诊断和适当的手术或血管干预是必须的。本研究旨在确定生物标志物和常规血液检查在评估急性肠系膜缺血患者的严重程度和死亡风险中的作用。方法:该研究采用前瞻性横断面设计,历时5年,共纳入147例因高度怀疑急性肠系膜缺血而接受急诊手术的患者。我们诊所使用的可用生物标志物包括全血细胞计数、总胆红素、CK、CK- mb、LDH、AST、ALT、淀粉酶和胆碱酯酶。结果:白细胞计数(OR=1.105)、血红蛋白(OR=3.912)、LDH(OR=1.144)、NLR (OR=1.154)、LLR (OR=1.286)均为ami诊断的独立且显著的危险因素。这些协变量被证明是诊断AMI的良好可靠工具,预测概率为75.3%。结论:预测工具被证明是可靠的,尽管只有在外科医生怀疑急性肠系膜缺血的临床背景下才应该考虑它。所提出的模型需要在更大规模的研究中进一步调查和验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What can hide behind an acute appendicitis? Rare case of ovarian and breast cancer as secondary manifestation of Non-Hodgkin lymphoma Utero-cutaneous fistula. Review Johann Anton von Mikulicz-Radecki in Sibiu Silent popliteal artery trauma – a case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1