Learning to select the correct answer in multi-stream question answering

IF 6.9 1区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Information Processing & Management Pub Date : 2011-11-01 Epub Date: 2010-05-13 DOI:10.1016/j.ipm.2010.03.007
Alberto Téllez-Valero , Manuel Montes-y-Gómez , Luis Villaseñor-Pineda , Anselmo Peñas Padilla
{"title":"Learning to select the correct answer in multi-stream question answering","authors":"Alberto Téllez-Valero ,&nbsp;Manuel Montes-y-Gómez ,&nbsp;Luis Villaseñor-Pineda ,&nbsp;Anselmo Peñas Padilla","doi":"10.1016/j.ipm.2010.03.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Question answering (QA) is the task of automatically answering a question posed in natural language. Currently, there exists several QA approaches, and, according to recent evaluation results, most of them are complementary. That is, different systems are relevant for different kinds of questions. Somehow, this fact indicates that a pertinent combination of various systems should allow to improve the individual results. This paper focuses on this problem, namely, the selection of the correct answer from a given set of responses corresponding to different QA systems. In particular, it proposes a supervised multi-stream approach that decides about the correctness of answers based on a set of features that describe: (i) the compatibility between question and answer types, (ii) the redundancy of answers across streams, as well as (iii) the overlap and non-overlap information between the question–answer pair and the support text. Experimental results are encouraging; evaluated over a set of 190 questions in Spanish and using answers from 17 different QA systems, our multi-stream QA approach could reach an estimated QA performance of 0.74, significantly outperforming the estimated performance from the best individual system (0.53) as well as the result from best traditional multi-stream QA approach (0.60).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50365,"journal":{"name":"Information Processing & Management","volume":"47 6","pages":"Pages 856-869"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ipm.2010.03.007","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Processing & Management","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306457310000270","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2010/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Question answering (QA) is the task of automatically answering a question posed in natural language. Currently, there exists several QA approaches, and, according to recent evaluation results, most of them are complementary. That is, different systems are relevant for different kinds of questions. Somehow, this fact indicates that a pertinent combination of various systems should allow to improve the individual results. This paper focuses on this problem, namely, the selection of the correct answer from a given set of responses corresponding to different QA systems. In particular, it proposes a supervised multi-stream approach that decides about the correctness of answers based on a set of features that describe: (i) the compatibility between question and answer types, (ii) the redundancy of answers across streams, as well as (iii) the overlap and non-overlap information between the question–answer pair and the support text. Experimental results are encouraging; evaluated over a set of 190 questions in Spanish and using answers from 17 different QA systems, our multi-stream QA approach could reach an estimated QA performance of 0.74, significantly outperforming the estimated performance from the best individual system (0.53) as well as the result from best traditional multi-stream QA approach (0.60).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学习在多流答题中选择正确答案
问答(QA)是自动回答以自然语言提出的问题的任务。目前,有几种QA方法,根据最近的评价结果,大多数QA方法是互补的。也就是说,不同的系统适用于不同类型的问题。不知何故,这一事实表明,各种系统的适当组合应该能够改善单个结果。本文关注的是这个问题,即从对应于不同QA系统的一组给定答案中选择正确答案。特别是,它提出了一种有监督的多流方法,该方法基于一组特征来决定答案的正确性,这些特征描述:(i)问题和答案类型之间的兼容性,(ii)跨流的答案冗余,以及(iii)问题-答案对与支持文本之间的重叠和非重叠信息。实验结果令人鼓舞;对西班牙语190个问题进行评估,并使用来自17个不同QA系统的答案,我们的多流QA方法可以达到0.74的估计QA性能,显著优于最佳个人系统(0.53)的估计性能以及最佳传统多流QA方法(0.60)的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Information Processing & Management
Information Processing & Management 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
11.60%
发文量
276
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Information Processing and Management is dedicated to publishing cutting-edge original research at the convergence of computing and information science. Our scope encompasses theory, methods, and applications across various domains, including advertising, business, health, information science, information technology marketing, and social computing. We aim to cater to the interests of both primary researchers and practitioners by offering an effective platform for the timely dissemination of advanced and topical issues in this interdisciplinary field. The journal places particular emphasis on original research articles, research survey articles, research method articles, and articles addressing critical applications of research. Join us in advancing knowledge and innovation at the intersection of computing and information science.
期刊最新文献
Fuzzy neighborhood rough set-based attribute reduction over temporal information systems with application to clinical efficacy evaluation Empowering open-domain LLMs for legal document correction via legal knowledge integration and decoding constraints CTJANet: A class-task joint-aware network for enhanced few-shot image classification ALC-DRKG: an active learning-based framework for dynamic knowledge graph construction for drug repositioning Measuring stance dynamics in political debate using temporal graph neural networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1