{"title":"Implementation Effectiveness of Electronic Liability Registration","authors":"Endah Subekti Tri Astuti, Widayati Widayati","doi":"10.30659/sanlar.3.4.1364-1374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to determine and analyze: 1) the effectiveness of the current electronic mortgage registration implementation. 2) Factors that affect the effectiveness of the current implementation of electronic mortgage registration. The approach method used in discussing this research problem is a normative juridical approach.The research specification used is descriptive analytical research. This type of data uses secondary data. The data analysis method used in this research is qualitative data analysis. The results of the study concluded: 1) The implementation of HT registration with the HT-el System at the Land Office has not all been carried out in accordance with the procedures stated in the Technical Guidelines for HT-el. Procedural discrepancies, for example, were found in files that were suspended and closed in 2019 until May 12, 2020. Application files that did not comply with the procedures were discovered based on the results of the Land Office inspection, if not checked, the HT-el certificate would be issued automatically on the seventh day. Issuance without any inspection from the Land Office if there is a procedural error, it is feared that it will become a problem in the future. Obstacles in HT registration with the HT-el System occur in PPAT, Banks as creditors and the Land Office. These obstacles arise during the HT registration process, both technically and non-technically. 2). Barriers related to technical aspects include the lack of facilities such as ranking selection, selecting more than one certificate and providing facilities for checking certificate data in HT-el applications. Meanwhile, in non-technical barriers, there are regulations in Permen ATR/BPN No. 5 of 2020 which is not in accordance with UUHT as the legal basis for the Ministerial Regulation issued, where in UUHT the second sheet of APHT and other warrants are submitted to the Land Office in physical form but in Permen ATR/BPN No. 5 of 2020 only in digital form of scan results.","PeriodicalId":279949,"journal":{"name":"Sultan Agung Notary Law Review","volume":"217 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sultan Agung Notary Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.3.4.1364-1374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to determine and analyze: 1) the effectiveness of the current electronic mortgage registration implementation. 2) Factors that affect the effectiveness of the current implementation of electronic mortgage registration. The approach method used in discussing this research problem is a normative juridical approach.The research specification used is descriptive analytical research. This type of data uses secondary data. The data analysis method used in this research is qualitative data analysis. The results of the study concluded: 1) The implementation of HT registration with the HT-el System at the Land Office has not all been carried out in accordance with the procedures stated in the Technical Guidelines for HT-el. Procedural discrepancies, for example, were found in files that were suspended and closed in 2019 until May 12, 2020. Application files that did not comply with the procedures were discovered based on the results of the Land Office inspection, if not checked, the HT-el certificate would be issued automatically on the seventh day. Issuance without any inspection from the Land Office if there is a procedural error, it is feared that it will become a problem in the future. Obstacles in HT registration with the HT-el System occur in PPAT, Banks as creditors and the Land Office. These obstacles arise during the HT registration process, both technically and non-technically. 2). Barriers related to technical aspects include the lack of facilities such as ranking selection, selecting more than one certificate and providing facilities for checking certificate data in HT-el applications. Meanwhile, in non-technical barriers, there are regulations in Permen ATR/BPN No. 5 of 2020 which is not in accordance with UUHT as the legal basis for the Ministerial Regulation issued, where in UUHT the second sheet of APHT and other warrants are submitted to the Land Office in physical form but in Permen ATR/BPN No. 5 of 2020 only in digital form of scan results.
本研究的目的是确定和分析:1)当前电子抵押登记实施的有效性。2)影响当前实施电子抵押登记有效性的因素。在讨论这一研究问题时所采用的方法是一种规范的法律方法。使用的研究规范是描述性分析研究。这种类型的数据使用辅助数据。本研究使用的数据分析方法是定性数据分析。研究的结论是:1)地政总署利用土地注册处的土地注册处系统进行土地注册处注册的工作,并非全都按照土地注册处技术指引所载的程序进行。例如,在2019年暂停并关闭至2020年5月12日的文件中发现了程序上的差异。根据土地局的检查结果,发现了不符合程序的申请文件,如果不检查,将在第7天自动颁发HT-el证书。如果在没有经过国土厅的检查的情况下发放,如果出现程序上的错误,恐怕以后会成为问题。在HT-el制度下进行HT登记的障碍出现在PPAT、作为债权人的银行和土地局。这些障碍出现在高温登记过程中,既有技术性的,也有非技术性的。2)技术方面的障碍包括在HT-el应用程序中缺乏诸如排序选择、选择多个证书和提供检查证书数据的设施等设施。同时,在非技术壁垒方面,2020年Permen ATR/BPN No 5中有一些规定与uht不一致,作为发布的部长法规的法律依据,其中uht中APHT的第二页和其他权证以实物形式提交给土地办公室,而2020年Permen ATR/BPN No 5中仅以扫描结果的数字形式提交。