Metacognition in Science Learning: Bibliometric Analysis of Last Two Decades

M. D. H. Wirzal, Nur Syakinah Abd Halim, N. A. H. Md Nordin, M. A. Bustam
{"title":"Metacognition in Science Learning: Bibliometric Analysis of Last Two Decades","authors":"M. D. H. Wirzal, Nur Syakinah Abd Halim, N. A. H. Md Nordin, M. A. Bustam","doi":"10.36312/esaintika.v6i1.665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main objective of this study was to map (1) the research of metacognition in science learning; (2) learning interventions used and metacognition’s key components that learned, integrated, and investigated; and (3) future research recommendations of metacognition research in science learning. We analyzed 438 scientific documents published in journals and books indexed in the Scopus database using VOSviewer software to visualize research trends and main keywords investigated of metacognition in science learning. The research findings show that research in the field of metacognition in science learning through the metacognition as attribution that integrated into learning interventions and as a learning outcome has increased in the last two decades. Scientific concepts understanding, critical thinking skills, motivation, and attention are the main goals in metacognition research. Inquiry-based learning, such as problem-based learning, is the most frequently used intervention to teach students metacognition. The research gaps found are (1) the cognitive regulations are the most investigated aspect, while cognitive aspects such as declarative knowledge, procedural knowledge, and conditional knowledge have not been widely investigated in science learning; (2) metacognition research on college students has a high frequency compared to school students; and (3) the integration of metacognition in online learning is still less investigated, this is indicated by the recommendations of several research results that encourage the integration of self-regulated learning into online learning.","PeriodicalId":165148,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika","volume":"249 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36312/esaintika.v6i1.665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to map (1) the research of metacognition in science learning; (2) learning interventions used and metacognition’s key components that learned, integrated, and investigated; and (3) future research recommendations of metacognition research in science learning. We analyzed 438 scientific documents published in journals and books indexed in the Scopus database using VOSviewer software to visualize research trends and main keywords investigated of metacognition in science learning. The research findings show that research in the field of metacognition in science learning through the metacognition as attribution that integrated into learning interventions and as a learning outcome has increased in the last two decades. Scientific concepts understanding, critical thinking skills, motivation, and attention are the main goals in metacognition research. Inquiry-based learning, such as problem-based learning, is the most frequently used intervention to teach students metacognition. The research gaps found are (1) the cognitive regulations are the most investigated aspect, while cognitive aspects such as declarative knowledge, procedural knowledge, and conditional knowledge have not been widely investigated in science learning; (2) metacognition research on college students has a high frequency compared to school students; and (3) the integration of metacognition in online learning is still less investigated, this is indicated by the recommendations of several research results that encourage the integration of self-regulated learning into online learning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科学学习中的元认知:近二十年文献计量学分析
本研究的主要目的是:(1)科学学习中的元认知研究;(2)使用的学习干预措施和元认知的关键组成部分的学习、整合和调查;(3)科学学习中元认知研究的未来研究建议。利用VOSviewer软件对Scopus数据库收录的438篇科学文献进行分析,对科学学习中元认知的研究趋势和主要关键词进行可视化分析。研究结果表明,近二十年来,将元认知作为归因整合到学习干预和作为学习结果的元认知领域在科学学习中的研究有所增加。科学概念理解、批判性思维技能、动机和注意力是元认知研究的主要目标。基于探究的学习,如基于问题的学习,是教授学生元认知最常用的干预手段。研究发现的不足之处在于:(1)认知规则是科学学习中研究最多的方面,而陈述性知识、程序性知识和条件性知识等认知方面的研究还不够广泛;(2)大学生元认知研究频次高于在校学生;(3)元认知在在线学习中的整合研究仍然较少,这从一些研究结果的建议中可以看出,这些研究结果鼓励将自主学习整合到在线学习中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Future Classroom: Analyzing the Integration and Impact of Digital Technologies in Science Education Characteristics of Project-Based Learning Models on the Project to Strengthening the Pancasila Student Profiles at Muhammadiyah School The Influence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Mobile Learning on Learning Outcomes in Higher Education: Did the Mediation of Self-Competence Matter? Bioindicators for Forest Area Condition: A Systematic Literature Review Learning Outcomes of the Inquiry-in-Action Model for Chemistry Experimentation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1