Corporate Governance Reporting: Compliance with Upper Limits for Severance Payments to Members of Executive Boards in Germany

A. Dilger, Ute Schottmüller-Einwag
{"title":"Corporate Governance Reporting: Compliance with Upper Limits for Severance Payments to Members of Executive Boards in Germany","authors":"A. Dilger, Ute Schottmüller-Einwag","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3601033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examine how corporate governance reporting corresponds to actual conduct regarding severance payment caps for prematurely departing members of executive boards in Germany. Firstly, we evaluate the declarations of conformity for all companies listed in the CDAX between 2010 and 2014, which we use to determine conformity and deviation rates, and analyse the reasons for deviation, contributing to current research on comparative corporate governance, which focuses on when, why and how companies deviate from legitimate corporate governance goals (Aguilera, Judge, & Terjesen, 2018). Secondly, we assess the compensation amounts of all severance payments made and published by DAX companies to compare the respective severance ratio with the cap recommended by the German Corporate Governance Code (GCGC). We find that more than 20% of companies listed in the CDAX declared deviation in the declaration of conformity. Moreover, in 57% of actual severance cases where DAX companies had previously declared their conformity, the cap was exceeded. Yet, none of the companies that had exceeded the cap disclosed this in the following declaration of conformity. In most cases, the corporate reports deviated from reality and therefore could not serve as a suitable basis for decisions by the capital market.","PeriodicalId":256682,"journal":{"name":"CGN: Board Decision-Making (Topic)","volume":"415 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGN: Board Decision-Making (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3601033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We examine how corporate governance reporting corresponds to actual conduct regarding severance payment caps for prematurely departing members of executive boards in Germany. Firstly, we evaluate the declarations of conformity for all companies listed in the CDAX between 2010 and 2014, which we use to determine conformity and deviation rates, and analyse the reasons for deviation, contributing to current research on comparative corporate governance, which focuses on when, why and how companies deviate from legitimate corporate governance goals (Aguilera, Judge, & Terjesen, 2018). Secondly, we assess the compensation amounts of all severance payments made and published by DAX companies to compare the respective severance ratio with the cap recommended by the German Corporate Governance Code (GCGC). We find that more than 20% of companies listed in the CDAX declared deviation in the declaration of conformity. Moreover, in 57% of actual severance cases where DAX companies had previously declared their conformity, the cap was exceeded. Yet, none of the companies that had exceeded the cap disclosed this in the following declaration of conformity. In most cases, the corporate reports deviated from reality and therefore could not serve as a suitable basis for decisions by the capital market.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公司治理报告:遵守德国执行董事会成员遣散费上限
我们研究了公司治理报告如何与德国执行董事会过早离职成员的遣散费上限相关的实际行为相对应。首先,我们评估了2010年至2014年间在CDAX上市的所有公司的符合性声明,我们用它来确定符合性和偏离率,并分析偏离的原因,为当前比较公司治理的研究做出贡献,该研究侧重于公司何时、为何以及如何偏离合法的公司治理目标(Aguilera, Judge, & Terjesen, 2018)。其次,我们评估了DAX公司支付和公布的所有遣散费的补偿金额,将各自的遣散费比率与德国公司治理准则(GCGC)建议的上限进行比较。我们发现,超过20%的CDAX上市公司在符合性声明中声明偏差。此外,在DAX公司此前宣布符合规定的实际遣散案中,有57%的公司超过了上限。然而,没有一家超过上限的公司在随后的符合性声明中披露了这一点。在大多数情况下,公司的报告与现实脱节,因此不能作为资本市场决策的合适依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The impact of Shariah supervisory board and Shariah audit committee on CSR adoption at Islamic banks Nudging Toward Diversity in the Boardroom: A Systematic Literature Review of Board Diversity of Financial Institutions Activist Settlements COVID-19 Pandemic: Emerging Board and Governance Considerations Boards in Information Governance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1