Impact of weeding methods on the content of nitrates in potato tubers

P. Barbaś, B. Sawicka
{"title":"Impact of weeding methods on the content of nitrates in potato tubers","authors":"P. Barbaś, B. Sawicka","doi":"10.17306/J.NPT.2016.4.49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The test results were based on a field experiment conducted in 2007-2009 in pilot plant of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute – National Research Institute in Jadwisin on lessive soil with granulometric composition of loamy sand. The experiment was carried out applying the method of drawn sub-blocks in the dependent arrangement, split-plot, in three replications. Row I factors were the cultivars ‘Irga’ and ‘Fianna’, and row II factors were weed control methods: 1) control object – without chemical protection, 2) extensive mechanical treatments (every 2 weeks), carried out after planting until rows reached closeness, 3) Sencor 70 WG – 1 kg·ha-1 of pre-emergence potato, 4) Sencor 70 WG – 1 kg·ha-1 + Titus 25 WG – 40 g·ha-1 + Trend 90 EC – 0.1% of pre-emergence potato, 5) Sencor 70 WG – 0.5 kg·ha-1 of post-emergence potato, 6) Sencor 70 WG – 0.3 kg·ha-1 + Titus 25 WG – 30 g·ha-1 + Trend 90 EC – 0.1% of post-emergence potato, 7) Sencor 70 WG – 0.3 kg·ha-1 + Fusilade Forte 150 EC – 2 dm·ha-1 of post-emergence potato, 8) Sencor 70 WG – 0.3 kg·ha-1 + Apyros 75 WG – 26.5 g·ha-1 + Atpolan 80 SC – 1 dm·ha-1 of post-emergence potato. Harvest was performed at the technical maturity of the potato. Nitrate markings were performed according to the colorimetric method. The value of the trait was to a large extent determined by genetic factors. A medium-early variety ‘Irga’ had a higher nitrate content compared to an average late variety ‘Fianna’. Nitrate concentration in potato tubers was dependent on the applied weeding control methods used and atmospheric conditions in the research years. The tubers with the highest concentration of nitrates came from the facility where pre-emergence potato preparations Sencor 70 WG + Titus 25 WG + Trend 90 EC were used.","PeriodicalId":366305,"journal":{"name":"Nauka Przyroda Technologie","volume":"175 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nauka Przyroda Technologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17306/J.NPT.2016.4.49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The test results were based on a field experiment conducted in 2007-2009 in pilot plant of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute – National Research Institute in Jadwisin on lessive soil with granulometric composition of loamy sand. The experiment was carried out applying the method of drawn sub-blocks in the dependent arrangement, split-plot, in three replications. Row I factors were the cultivars ‘Irga’ and ‘Fianna’, and row II factors were weed control methods: 1) control object – without chemical protection, 2) extensive mechanical treatments (every 2 weeks), carried out after planting until rows reached closeness, 3) Sencor 70 WG – 1 kg·ha-1 of pre-emergence potato, 4) Sencor 70 WG – 1 kg·ha-1 + Titus 25 WG – 40 g·ha-1 + Trend 90 EC – 0.1% of pre-emergence potato, 5) Sencor 70 WG – 0.5 kg·ha-1 of post-emergence potato, 6) Sencor 70 WG – 0.3 kg·ha-1 + Titus 25 WG – 30 g·ha-1 + Trend 90 EC – 0.1% of post-emergence potato, 7) Sencor 70 WG – 0.3 kg·ha-1 + Fusilade Forte 150 EC – 2 dm·ha-1 of post-emergence potato, 8) Sencor 70 WG – 0.3 kg·ha-1 + Apyros 75 WG – 26.5 g·ha-1 + Atpolan 80 SC – 1 dm·ha-1 of post-emergence potato. Harvest was performed at the technical maturity of the potato. Nitrate markings were performed according to the colorimetric method. The value of the trait was to a large extent determined by genetic factors. A medium-early variety ‘Irga’ had a higher nitrate content compared to an average late variety ‘Fianna’. Nitrate concentration in potato tubers was dependent on the applied weeding control methods used and atmospheric conditions in the research years. The tubers with the highest concentration of nitrates came from the facility where pre-emergence potato preparations Sencor 70 WG + Titus 25 WG + Trend 90 EC were used.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
除草方式对马铃薯块茎中硝酸盐含量的影响
试验结果基于2007-2009年在贾德威辛植物育种与驯化研究所-国家研究所中试工厂进行的大田试验,试验土壤为颗粒组成的壤土砂。实验采用分离图法绘制子块,分3次重复。第1行因子为‘Irga’和‘Fianna’品种,第2行因子为杂草防治方法;1)控制对象——没有化学保护,2)大量的机械方法(每两周),进行种植,直到行达到亲密后,3)Sencor 70 WG - 1公斤·农业pre-emergence土豆,4)Sencor 70 WG - 1公斤·农业+提多25 WG - 90 g·农业+趋势的EC - 0.1% pre-emergence土豆,5)Sencor 70 WG - 0.5公斤·农业萌发后的土豆,6)Sencor 70 WG - 0.3公斤·农业+提多25 WG - 30 g·农业+趋势90 EC - 0.1%的萌发后土豆,7) senor 70 WG - 0.3 kg·ha-1 + Fusilade Forte 150 EC - 2 dm·ha-1, 8) senor 70 WG - 0.3 kg·ha-1 + Apyros 75 WG - 26.5 g·ha-1 + Atpolan 80 SC -1 dm·ha-1。在马铃薯技术成熟时进行收获。用比色法进行硝酸盐标记。性状的价值在很大程度上是由遗传因素决定的。中早熟品种“Irga”的硝酸盐含量高于平均晚熟品种“Fianna”。马铃薯块茎中硝酸盐浓度与研究年份所采用的除草控制方法和大气条件有关。硝酸盐浓度最高的块茎来自使用发芽前马铃薯制剂senor 70 WG + Titus 25 WG + Trend 90 EC的设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The dendroflora of the historical manor park in Mały Buczek in Greater Poland voivodeship Impact of water reservoirs in Nienawiszcz on improve of the visual values of landscape Analysis of Żelaźnieńska sheep reproductive traits in different herd locations The content of lead and cadmium in selected vegetables in the Lublin region The influence of biostimulants on the content of phenolic compounds in broccoli heads during short-term storage at room temperature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1