Why so Emotional? An Analysis of Emotional Bot-generated Content on Twitter

Ema Kusen, Mark Strembeck
{"title":"Why so Emotional? An Analysis of Emotional Bot-generated Content on Twitter","authors":"Ema Kusen, Mark Strembeck","doi":"10.5220/0006699500130022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we present a study on the emotions conveyed in b ot-generated Twitter messages as compared to emotions conveyed in human-generated messages. Social b ts are software programs that automatically produce messages and interact with human users on social med ia platforms. In recent years, bots have become quite complex and may mimic the behavior of human users. Prio r studies have shown that emotional messages may significantly influence their readers. Therefore, it is i mportant to study the effects that emotional botgenerated content has on the reactions of human users and on i formation diffusion over online social networks (OSNs). For the purposes of this paper, we analyzed 1.3 milli on Twitter accounts that generated 4.4 million tweets related to 24 systematically chosen real-world even ts. Our findings show that: 1) bots emotionally polarize during controversial events and even inject polar izing emotions into the Twitter discourse on harmless events such as Thanksgiving, 2) humans generally tend to con f rm to the base emotion of the respective event, while bots contribute to the higher intensity of shifted emo tions (i.e. emotions that do not conform to the base emotion of the respective event), 3) bots tend to shift emoti ons to receive more attention (in terms of likes and retweets).","PeriodicalId":414016,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Complex Information Systems","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Complex Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5220/0006699500130022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

In this paper, we present a study on the emotions conveyed in b ot-generated Twitter messages as compared to emotions conveyed in human-generated messages. Social b ts are software programs that automatically produce messages and interact with human users on social med ia platforms. In recent years, bots have become quite complex and may mimic the behavior of human users. Prio r studies have shown that emotional messages may significantly influence their readers. Therefore, it is i mportant to study the effects that emotional botgenerated content has on the reactions of human users and on i formation diffusion over online social networks (OSNs). For the purposes of this paper, we analyzed 1.3 milli on Twitter accounts that generated 4.4 million tweets related to 24 systematically chosen real-world even ts. Our findings show that: 1) bots emotionally polarize during controversial events and even inject polar izing emotions into the Twitter discourse on harmless events such as Thanksgiving, 2) humans generally tend to con f rm to the base emotion of the respective event, while bots contribute to the higher intensity of shifted emo tions (i.e. emotions that do not conform to the base emotion of the respective event), 3) bots tend to shift emoti ons to receive more attention (in terms of likes and retweets).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么这么情绪化?对Twitter上情感机器人生成内容的分析
在本文中,我们对人工生成的Twitter消息所传达的情感进行了研究,并将其与人工生成的消息所传达的情感进行了比较。社交软件是在社交媒体平台上自动生成信息并与人类用户互动的软件程序。近年来,机器人已经变得相当复杂,可能会模仿人类用户的行为。先前的研究表明,情感信息可能会对读者产生重大影响。因此,研究情感生成内容对人类用户的反应和信息在在线社交网络(OSNs)上的传播的影响是很重要的。为了本文的目的,我们分析了130万个Twitter账户,这些账户产生了440万条与24个系统选择的现实世界事件相关的推文。我们的发现表明:1)机器人情绪极化在有争议的事件,甚至Twitter话语注入极地工业区情绪无害的活动,比如感恩节,2)人类一般倾向于反对f rm各自的基本情感事件,而机器人设计有助于转移情绪摇滚的高强度(即情绪,不符合各自的基本情感事件),3)机器人往往转变emoti ons收到更多的关注(喜欢和转发)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Moving Other Way: Exploring Word Mover Distance Extensions Artificial Neural Networks Jamming on the Beat FLOPTICS: A Novel Automated Gating Technique for Flow Cytometry Data It Means More if It Sounds Good: Yet Another Hypotheses Concerning the Evolution of Polysemous Words An Empirical Research on the Investment Strategy of Stock Market based on Deep Reinforcement Learning model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1