Breaking the glass ceiling for a sustainable future: the power of women on corporate boards in reducing ESG controversies

A. Issa, J. Hanaysha
{"title":"Breaking the glass ceiling for a sustainable future: the power of women on corporate boards in reducing ESG controversies","authors":"A. Issa, J. Hanaysha","doi":"10.1108/ijaim-03-2023-0053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to investigate the relationship between board gender diversity and environmental, social and governance (ESG) controversies and to determine if a critical mass of female directors has a significant impact on ESG performance.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe study analyzes a sample of non-financial companies from 13 European countries between 2004 and 2021. The primary method used to reach conclusions was the pooled ordinary least squares regression. Additionally, the study used supplementary techniques such as alternative measurement, sub-sample analysis and two-stage least squares to enhance its reliability.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results indicate that a higher representation of women on boards is correlated with a reduction in the number of ESG controversies, particularly when there are three or more female directors. Furthermore, the relationship between board gender diversity and ESG controversies may be affected by factors such as industry, governance and a company’s environmental performance.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis study suggests that increasing women’s representation on boards may mitigate ESG controversies and improve firm reputation and performance, especially in industries with high ESG risks. Policymakers can support this through policies, targets, training and inclusive practices. The findings also inform investors and stakeholders of the relationship between board gender diversity and ESG controversies.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study expands the understanding of the relationship between board gender diversity and sustainable accounting and finance. It focuses on the effect that having female board members has on corporate policies, which is significant for shaping global policies that promote diversity on boards.\n","PeriodicalId":229587,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Accounting & Information Management","volume":"209 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Accounting & Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijaim-03-2023-0053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate the relationship between board gender diversity and environmental, social and governance (ESG) controversies and to determine if a critical mass of female directors has a significant impact on ESG performance. Design/methodology/approach The study analyzes a sample of non-financial companies from 13 European countries between 2004 and 2021. The primary method used to reach conclusions was the pooled ordinary least squares regression. Additionally, the study used supplementary techniques such as alternative measurement, sub-sample analysis and two-stage least squares to enhance its reliability. Findings The results indicate that a higher representation of women on boards is correlated with a reduction in the number of ESG controversies, particularly when there are three or more female directors. Furthermore, the relationship between board gender diversity and ESG controversies may be affected by factors such as industry, governance and a company’s environmental performance. Practical implications This study suggests that increasing women’s representation on boards may mitigate ESG controversies and improve firm reputation and performance, especially in industries with high ESG risks. Policymakers can support this through policies, targets, training and inclusive practices. The findings also inform investors and stakeholders of the relationship between board gender diversity and ESG controversies. Originality/value This study expands the understanding of the relationship between board gender diversity and sustainable accounting and finance. It focuses on the effect that having female board members has on corporate policies, which is significant for shaping global policies that promote diversity on boards.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
打破玻璃天花板创造可持续未来:企业董事会女性在减少ESG争议方面的力量
本研究旨在探讨董事会性别多样性与环境、社会和治理(ESG)争议之间的关系,并确定女性董事的临界数量是否对ESG绩效有显著影响。设计/方法/方法该研究分析了2004年至2021年间来自13个欧洲国家的非金融公司样本。得出结论的主要方法是合并普通最小二乘回归。此外,研究还使用了替代测量、子样本分析和两阶段最小二乘等辅助技术来提高其可靠性。研究结果表明,董事会中女性比例较高与ESG争议数量减少相关,特别是当有三名或更多女性董事时。此外,董事会性别多样性与ESG争议之间的关系可能受到行业、治理和公司环境绩效等因素的影响。实践意义本研究表明,增加董事会女性代表可以缓解ESG争议,提高公司声誉和绩效,特别是在ESG风险高的行业。政策制定者可以通过政策、目标、培训和包容性做法来支持这一点。研究结果还让投资者和利益相关者了解了董事会性别多样性与ESG争议之间的关系。原创性/价值本研究扩展了对董事会性别多样性与可持续会计和财务之间关系的理解。它关注的是女性董事会成员对公司政策的影响,这对于制定促进董事会多元化的全球政策具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Digital financial literacy and usage of cashless payments in Jordan: the moderating role of gender Digital financial literacy and usage of cashless payments in Jordan: the moderating role of gender Financial innovation and gender dynamics: a comparative study of male and female FinTech adoption in emerging economies Board gender diversity, audit quality, and the moderating role of political connections: evidence from the Gulf Co-operation Council Countries (GCC) Manager sentiment, policy uncertainty, ESG disclosure and firm performance: a large language model in corporate landscape
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1