The Comparison of Students Mathematics Learning Outcomes Between Using Performance Assessment and Self-assessment

Hernita Octaviani Putri, Jamali, Arif Muchyidin
{"title":"The Comparison of Students Mathematics Learning Outcomes Between Using Performance Assessment and Self-assessment","authors":"Hernita Octaviani Putri, Jamali, Arif Muchyidin","doi":"10.58421/misro.v1i2.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A good assessment covers three aspects: cognitive, affective, and psychomotor. Many teachers tend to assess only the cognitive aspect. This problem requires treatment in the form of appropriate assessment so that the development of student learning outcomes not only covers the knowledge aspect only. This research aims to find out the result of students learning outcomes in a group of mathematic learners after being given treatment in the form of performance assessment and self-assessment and find out which treatment gives better results amongst students who are treated in the form of performance assessment and self-assessment. This research is an experimental study. The population taken is all students in grade X of MA Ash-Siddiqiyyah. The sample was taken based on purpose, namely purposive sampling. The class used as the experimental class I is class X IPA 1, which amounted to 30 students, and class X IPS 2, which amounted to 30 students, is experimental class II. Based on the results obtained, the average student learning outcomes in experimental class I is in the high category with an average number gain value of 0.71. The average student learning outcomes in experimental class II are in the medium category and are shown by the average number of gain values of 0.64. Based on the hypothesis test results, the decision is to reject Ho and accept Ha. Then it can be concluded that the results of student learning in the learning group treated by performance assessment are better than student learning outcomes in the learning group treated with self-assessment.","PeriodicalId":105115,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematics Instruction, Social Research and Opinion","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mathematics Instruction, Social Research and Opinion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58421/misro.v1i2.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A good assessment covers three aspects: cognitive, affective, and psychomotor. Many teachers tend to assess only the cognitive aspect. This problem requires treatment in the form of appropriate assessment so that the development of student learning outcomes not only covers the knowledge aspect only. This research aims to find out the result of students learning outcomes in a group of mathematic learners after being given treatment in the form of performance assessment and self-assessment and find out which treatment gives better results amongst students who are treated in the form of performance assessment and self-assessment. This research is an experimental study. The population taken is all students in grade X of MA Ash-Siddiqiyyah. The sample was taken based on purpose, namely purposive sampling. The class used as the experimental class I is class X IPA 1, which amounted to 30 students, and class X IPS 2, which amounted to 30 students, is experimental class II. Based on the results obtained, the average student learning outcomes in experimental class I is in the high category with an average number gain value of 0.71. The average student learning outcomes in experimental class II are in the medium category and are shown by the average number of gain values of 0.64. Based on the hypothesis test results, the decision is to reject Ho and accept Ha. Then it can be concluded that the results of student learning in the learning group treated by performance assessment are better than student learning outcomes in the learning group treated with self-assessment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运用绩效评价与自我评价对学生数学学习成果的比较
一个好的评估包括三个方面:认知、情感和精神运动。许多教师倾向于只评估认知方面。这一问题需要以适当的评估形式进行处理,使学生学习成果的发展不仅仅局限于知识方面。本研究旨在了解一组数学学习者在接受绩效评估和自我评估形式的治疗后,学生的学习成果的结果,以及在接受绩效评估和自我评估形式的学生中,哪一种治疗效果更好。这项研究是一项实验性研究。所取的人口是MA Ash-Siddiqiyyah十年级的所有学生。抽样是有目的的,即有目的抽样。实验I班为X IPA 1班,共30人,实验II班为X IPA 2班,共30人。从所得结果来看,实验一班学生的平均学习成果处于较高水平,平均人数增益值为0.71。实验二班学生的平均学习成果处于中等水平,平均增益值为0.64。根据假设检验的结果,决定拒绝Ho,接受Ha。那么我们可以得出结论,接受绩效评估的学习组学生的学习结果优于接受自我评估的学习组学生的学习结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of H5P Course Presentation to Improve Student Mathematics Learning Outcomes Impact of Interest and Motivation on Academic Achievement of Junior Secondary School Students in Mathematics Descriptive Survey of Preservice Mathematics Teachers’ Perceived Knowledge and Use of Teaching and Learning Materials Capital Structure and Financial Performance of Manufacturing Companies in Nepal Decision Support System Using the Multi-Objective Optimization Based on Ratio Analysis (MOORA) Method to Determine the World of Work Partners Competency Test at SMK Karnas Sindangwangi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1