Temporal changes of left ventricular synchronization parameters and outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy

IF 0.3 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2016-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ejccm.2016.04.001
Walid Ahmed , Wael Samy , Osama Tayeh , Noha Behairy , Alia Abd el Fattah
{"title":"Temporal changes of left ventricular synchronization parameters and outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy","authors":"Walid Ahmed ,&nbsp;Wael Samy ,&nbsp;Osama Tayeh ,&nbsp;Noha Behairy ,&nbsp;Alia Abd el Fattah","doi":"10.1016/j.ejccm.2016.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Left ventricular dyssynchrony plays an important role in predicting response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Thirty patients underwent CRT implantation. Assessment of left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony was done through Gated SPECT LV phase analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty patients received CRT (mean age 58.7<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->9.0, 24 males). CRT implantation had a favorable prognosis on cardiac functions (LVEF preimplantation: 26.8<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4.7% versus 29.1<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->6.4% post-implantation; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.002). Reverse LV remodeling (⩾15%) was documented in 19 patients. Temporal changes in LV dyssynchrony parameters were correlated to LV reverse remodeling. Applying ROC curve for LV phase analysis showed that a cutoff value of 152° for histogram bandwidth had a sensitivity of 72.7% and specificity of 63.2% for predicting CRT non-response status. Also, a cutoff value of 54° for histogram standard deviation had a sensitivity of 81.8% and specificity of 63.2%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Responders of CRT showed improved LV dyssynchrony profiles. Utilizing Gated SPECT LV analysis could provide predictors for CRT non-response. Reverse LV remodeling is associated with temporal improvements in LV dyssynchrony parameters.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":31233,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","volume":"4 2","pages":"Pages 105-112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ejccm.2016.04.001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090730316300226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Left ventricular dyssynchrony plays an important role in predicting response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

Methods

Thirty patients underwent CRT implantation. Assessment of left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony was done through Gated SPECT LV phase analysis.

Results

Thirty patients received CRT (mean age 58.7 ± 9.0, 24 males). CRT implantation had a favorable prognosis on cardiac functions (LVEF preimplantation: 26.8 ± 4.7% versus 29.1 ± 6.4% post-implantation; P = 0.002). Reverse LV remodeling (⩾15%) was documented in 19 patients. Temporal changes in LV dyssynchrony parameters were correlated to LV reverse remodeling. Applying ROC curve for LV phase analysis showed that a cutoff value of 152° for histogram bandwidth had a sensitivity of 72.7% and specificity of 63.2% for predicting CRT non-response status. Also, a cutoff value of 54° for histogram standard deviation had a sensitivity of 81.8% and specificity of 63.2%.

Conclusion

Responders of CRT showed improved LV dyssynchrony profiles. Utilizing Gated SPECT LV analysis could provide predictors for CRT non-response. Reverse LV remodeling is associated with temporal improvements in LV dyssynchrony parameters.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
左室同步化参数的时间变化及心脏再同步化治疗的结果
背景左心室非同步化在预测心脏再同步化治疗(CRT)的反应中起着重要作用。方法30例患者行CRT植入术。通过门控SPECT左室相分析评估左室非同步化。结果30例患者接受CRT治疗,平均年龄58.7±9.0岁,男性24例。CRT植入对心功能预后良好(植入前LVEF: 26.8±4.7% vs植入后29.1±6.4%;p = 0.002)。19名患者记录了逆行左室重塑(小于15%)。左室非同步化参数的时间变化与左室反向重构相关。应用ROC曲线进行LV期分析,直方图带宽截断值为152°时,预测CRT无反应状态的敏感性为72.7%,特异性为63.2%。直方图标准差截断值为54°时,敏感性为81.8%,特异性为63.2%。结论CRT应答者的左室不同步特征有所改善。门控SPECT LV分析可作为CRT无反应的预测指标。左室反向重构与左室非同步化参数的时间改善有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
42 weeks
期刊介绍: The Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine is the official Journal of the Egyptian College of Critical Care Physicians, the most authoritative organization of Egyptian physicians involved in the multi-professional field of critical care medicine. The journal is intended to provide a peer-reviewed source for multidisciplinary coverage of general acute and intensive care medicine and its various subcategories including cardiac, pulmonary, neuro, renal as well as post-operative care. The journal is proud to have an international multi-professional editorial board in the broad field of critical care that will assist in publishing promising research and breakthrough reports that lead to better patients care in life threatening conditions, and bring the reader a quick access to the latest diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in monitoring and management of critically ill patients.
期刊最新文献
Choosing Between Enoxaparin and Fondaparinux for the Prevention of Thromboembolism: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials Multiple Rib Fractures Management in a Tertiary Trauma Center: A Retrospective Observational Study Anterior Abdominal Wall Ecchymosis in COVID-19 Patient Following Enoxaparin Use Diaphragmatic Function Assessment Using Chest Ultrasonography as a Predictor for Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation Anaerobic Metabolism Markers as a Guide of Resuscitation Effort and Mortality Benefit in Septic Shock Among Egyptian Population
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1