Comparative Analysis of Zen Philosophy: Rinzai and Soto

O. Novikova, I. Rodicheva
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Zen Philosophy: Rinzai and Soto","authors":"O. Novikova, I. Rodicheva","doi":"10.17212/2075-0862-2022-14.4.1-83-97","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The practical methods of studying Zen, known as ‘pure zazen’ and the ‘koan method’ of the Buddhist schools of Rinzai and Soto are subjected to comparative analysis. This study focuses on the comprehension of Zen philosophy, and also analyzes the basic attitudes regarding the difference from the old Buddhist schools in Japan: practical activity, self-improvememt and indifference to death come first, as well as new aesthetic norms and ideals. Simplicity, the absence of any authority, the absence of rituals and anti-intellectualism corresponded to the spirit of the era when the once unshakable moral values were collapsing. Comparing the two Buddhist schools, the authors of the article note that the distinguishing feature of Soto, founded in Japan by Dogen, is absolute immersion in the meditative practice of ‘Silent illumination of Zen’ (黙想 mokuso), which outlines the path to enlightenment through sitting meditation. At the same time the emphasis is placed on the fact that this is a complex and not fast process of passing through certain stages in comprehending the teaching. Rinzai Zen in Japan is most associated with learning through koan work, and the origin of this practice dates back to master Linji from the time of the Song dynasty, namely Daie Soko, who collected and arranged all the major koans in a specific order for ease of use. But the very practice of comprehending the teaching is distinguished by its rather harsh and cruel methods, since the teachers considered it necessary to tear the student out of everyday life and the fastest way is to hit or to shout at a person. It was this philosophical practice of Rinzai Zen that was spread in Japan by Eisai. As a result of the study, the authors came to the conclusion that the masters of the Rinzai school proclaim the importance of ‘sudden enlightenment’, and the masters of the Soto school teach to follow the path of ‘progressive enlightenment’, and thus Soto and Rinzai become Zen schools that use opposite methods to achieve insight.","PeriodicalId":336825,"journal":{"name":"Ideas and Ideals","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ideas and Ideals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17212/2075-0862-2022-14.4.1-83-97","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The practical methods of studying Zen, known as ‘pure zazen’ and the ‘koan method’ of the Buddhist schools of Rinzai and Soto are subjected to comparative analysis. This study focuses on the comprehension of Zen philosophy, and also analyzes the basic attitudes regarding the difference from the old Buddhist schools in Japan: practical activity, self-improvememt and indifference to death come first, as well as new aesthetic norms and ideals. Simplicity, the absence of any authority, the absence of rituals and anti-intellectualism corresponded to the spirit of the era when the once unshakable moral values were collapsing. Comparing the two Buddhist schools, the authors of the article note that the distinguishing feature of Soto, founded in Japan by Dogen, is absolute immersion in the meditative practice of ‘Silent illumination of Zen’ (黙想 mokuso), which outlines the path to enlightenment through sitting meditation. At the same time the emphasis is placed on the fact that this is a complex and not fast process of passing through certain stages in comprehending the teaching. Rinzai Zen in Japan is most associated with learning through koan work, and the origin of this practice dates back to master Linji from the time of the Song dynasty, namely Daie Soko, who collected and arranged all the major koans in a specific order for ease of use. But the very practice of comprehending the teaching is distinguished by its rather harsh and cruel methods, since the teachers considered it necessary to tear the student out of everyday life and the fastest way is to hit or to shout at a person. It was this philosophical practice of Rinzai Zen that was spread in Japan by Eisai. As a result of the study, the authors came to the conclusion that the masters of the Rinzai school proclaim the importance of ‘sudden enlightenment’, and the masters of the Soto school teach to follow the path of ‘progressive enlightenment’, and thus Soto and Rinzai become Zen schools that use opposite methods to achieve insight.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
禅宗哲学之比较分析:临哉与索托
研究禅宗的实践方法,被称为“纯坐禅”和“公案法”的佛教学派的临济和索托是比较分析。本研究着重于对禅宗哲学的理解,并分析了日本禅宗与旧佛教流派的差异的基本态度:实践活动,自我提升,淡然死亡,以及新的审美规范和理想。简单,没有任何权威,没有仪式和反智主义,与曾经不可动摇的道德价值观崩溃的时代精神相对应。这篇文章的作者比较了这两个佛教流派,指出道根在日本创立的索托佛教的显著特点是完全沉浸在“禅的静照”的冥想实践中,它概述了通过静坐冥想获得启蒙的道路。同时强调的是,这是一个复杂的、不快速的过程,需要经过理解教学的某些阶段。在日本,临济禅宗与通过公案学习联系最为密切,这种做法的起源可以追溯到宋朝的林济大师,即大寺子,他收集并整理了所有主要的公案,以便于使用。但是,理解教学的实践以其相当苛刻和残酷的方法而闻名,因为教师认为有必要将学生从日常生活中解脱出来,而最快的方法就是打或对人大喊大叫。正是这种临宰禅的哲学实践,由卫材在日本传播开来。通过研究,作者得出结论:临济学派的大师们宣扬“突然顿悟”的重要性,而索托学派的大师们则教导遵循“渐进顿悟”的道路,因此,索托和临济成为了使用相反方法获得顿悟的禅宗流派。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Problems of Innovative Activity Development of the Novosibirsk Region Important Contribution to the Coverage of National Income Statistics and the Economic History of Pre-Revolutionary Russia and the USSR How the Existent and the Deontic Meet Cinema as a “Soft Power” Instrument of the State: Examples of Spanish and U.S. Cinematography Some Problems with Artificial Intelligence Ethics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1