INFLUENCE OF INTEREST GROUPS IN INDONESIAN HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE POLICY MAKING TO ROHINGYA IN 2017

A. Halim, P. Nasir
{"title":"INFLUENCE OF INTEREST GROUPS IN INDONESIAN HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE POLICY MAKING TO ROHINGYA IN 2017","authors":"A. Halim, P. Nasir","doi":"10.1515/9783110678666-003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Internal conflict between communities in Rohingya, Myanmar with fluctuations and conflicting tendencies. This condition is based on several reasons. There are two compelling reasons on which this conflict continues. The first reason is about the citizenship of Rohingya Muslims who are considered not a native of Myanmar. The second reason is about the tendency of religious differences adopted by Rohingya Muslims with the majority religion of Myanmar people. Conditions of conflict have implications for the increasing number of victims which resulted humanitarian crisis. The escalation of conflict that led to the humanitarian crisis occurred in August 2017. In this condition, the Myanmar government tried to close itself from international assistance and attention. Indonesia is the only country that can dialogue, open up humanitarian space and provide humanitarian assistance related to these conditions. The aim of this research is to analyze the role of interest groups in influencing the government in making policies on Indonesian humanitarian assistance to Rohingya ethnicities on the escalation of conflict in 2017. Foreign policy making in the context of humanitarian assistance will not be separated from the domestic political constellation of a country. This research sees that interest groups play a large role in influencing the government to make a policy related to humanitarian assistance to Rohingya ethnicity in the escalation of conflict in 2017. The influence given by interest groups will be seen in two roles. The role is the demands and alternative recommendations given by interest groups to the government as policy makers. Demands can be interpreted in the form of demonstrations and stances, while alternative recommendations are concrete recommendations submitted to the government to make policies in accordance with the interests brought. The method that will be used in this research is a qualitative method with a descriptive analysis type.","PeriodicalId":424710,"journal":{"name":"The International Conference on ASEAN 2019","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Conference on ASEAN 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110678666-003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Internal conflict between communities in Rohingya, Myanmar with fluctuations and conflicting tendencies. This condition is based on several reasons. There are two compelling reasons on which this conflict continues. The first reason is about the citizenship of Rohingya Muslims who are considered not a native of Myanmar. The second reason is about the tendency of religious differences adopted by Rohingya Muslims with the majority religion of Myanmar people. Conditions of conflict have implications for the increasing number of victims which resulted humanitarian crisis. The escalation of conflict that led to the humanitarian crisis occurred in August 2017. In this condition, the Myanmar government tried to close itself from international assistance and attention. Indonesia is the only country that can dialogue, open up humanitarian space and provide humanitarian assistance related to these conditions. The aim of this research is to analyze the role of interest groups in influencing the government in making policies on Indonesian humanitarian assistance to Rohingya ethnicities on the escalation of conflict in 2017. Foreign policy making in the context of humanitarian assistance will not be separated from the domestic political constellation of a country. This research sees that interest groups play a large role in influencing the government to make a policy related to humanitarian assistance to Rohingya ethnicity in the escalation of conflict in 2017. The influence given by interest groups will be seen in two roles. The role is the demands and alternative recommendations given by interest groups to the government as policy makers. Demands can be interpreted in the form of demonstrations and stances, while alternative recommendations are concrete recommendations submitted to the government to make policies in accordance with the interests brought. The method that will be used in this research is a qualitative method with a descriptive analysis type.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利益集团对2017年印尼罗兴亚人人道主义援助政策制定的影响
缅甸罗兴亚社区之间的内部冲突,有波动和冲突的趋势。这种情况是基于几个原因。有两个令人信服的理由使这场冲突继续下去。第一个原因是罗兴亚穆斯林的公民身份,他们被认为不是缅甸本地人。第二个原因是罗兴亚穆斯林倾向于与缅甸人民的多数宗教采取宗教差异。冲突的条件对越来越多的受害者产生影响,从而造成人道主义危机。导致人道主义危机的冲突升级发生在2017年8月。在这种情况下,缅甸政府试图将自己封闭在国际援助和关注之外。印度尼西亚是唯一能够就这些情况进行对话、开辟人道主义空间和提供人道主义援助的国家。本研究的目的是分析在2017年冲突升级的情况下,利益集团在影响政府制定印尼对罗兴亚民族人道主义援助政策方面的作用。在人道主义援助的背景下制定外交政策不能脱离一个国家的国内政治格局。本研究发现,在2017年冲突升级中,利益集团在影响政府制定与罗兴亚族人道主义援助相关的政策方面发挥了很大作用。利益集团的影响表现为两种作用。这个角色是利益集团向作为政策制定者的政府提出的要求和替代建议。诉求可以解释为示威和立场,替代建议则是向政府提出的具体建议,根据所带来的利益制定政策。本研究将使用的方法是一种定性的描述性分析方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SECURITIZING THE ENVIRONMENT: A CASE OF MARINE DEBRIS IN INDONESIA THE POLICY OF ASEAN COMPREHENSIVE INVESTMENT AGREEMENT (ACIA) IN THE LAW OF INDONESIA'S CAPITAL INVESTMENT ON THE ASEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY BELT AND ROAD INITIATIVE PROJECT IN MYANMAR: CHINA PUBLIC DIPLOMACY EU CITIZENSHIP AND RELEVANCY FOR ASEAN IN SUSTAINABLE REGUGEE MANAGEMENT THROUGH THE ROLE OF TNCS LITERATURE STUDY ABOUT HALF RUBBER TREATMENT PROCESSING BY VILLAGE OWNED ENTERPRISES AS EMPOWERMENT IN INCREASING RUBBER FARMERS INCOME IN RURAL
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1