A Prospect Theory Approach Explaining the Low Demand for Index-Based Insurance

Immanuel Lampe, Daniel Würtenberger
{"title":"A Prospect Theory Approach Explaining the Low Demand for Index-Based Insurance","authors":"Immanuel Lampe, Daniel Würtenberger","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3098120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a neoclassical framework risk averse agents ask for full insurance coverage if the premium is actuarially fair. Recent empirical observations of the demand for index-based weather insurance in developing countries reveal the opposite: the more risk averse farmers are, the less they buy insurance. In this work, we investigate if the same holds for loss averse farmers, i.e., if loss aversion might explain low take-up rates of index insurance. Therefore, we set up a stochastic model using prospect theory preferences. We distinguish two different groups of farmers: sophisticated farmers who understand the insurance product and naive farmers. Naive farmers neglect insurance coverage even if the premium is highly subsidized. Further, higher loss aversion implies a lower take-up rate. Sophisticated farmers buy more insurance the more loss averse they are. Finally, insurance demand might increase with a more frequent payout and a deferred premium payment.","PeriodicalId":305946,"journal":{"name":"AARN: Economic Systems (Sub-Topic)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AARN: Economic Systems (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3098120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a neoclassical framework risk averse agents ask for full insurance coverage if the premium is actuarially fair. Recent empirical observations of the demand for index-based weather insurance in developing countries reveal the opposite: the more risk averse farmers are, the less they buy insurance. In this work, we investigate if the same holds for loss averse farmers, i.e., if loss aversion might explain low take-up rates of index insurance. Therefore, we set up a stochastic model using prospect theory preferences. We distinguish two different groups of farmers: sophisticated farmers who understand the insurance product and naive farmers. Naive farmers neglect insurance coverage even if the premium is highly subsidized. Further, higher loss aversion implies a lower take-up rate. Sophisticated farmers buy more insurance the more loss averse they are. Finally, insurance demand might increase with a more frequent payout and a deferred premium payment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
指数型保险低需求的前景理论分析
在新古典主义框架中,如果保费在精算上是公平的,规避风险的代理人会要求获得全额保险。最近对发展中国家基于指数的天气保险需求的实证观察揭示了相反的情况:农民越厌恶风险,他们购买的保险就越少。在这项工作中,我们调查了是否同样适用于损失厌恶的农民,即,如果损失厌恶可以解释指数保险的低吸收率。因此,我们建立了一个基于前景理论偏好的随机模型。我们将农民分为两类:了解保险产品的老道农民和幼稚农民。天真的农民忽视保险,即使保费有很高的补贴。此外,更高的损失厌恶意味着更低的吸纳率。经验丰富的农民购买的保险越多,他们就越厌恶损失。最后,保险需求可能会随着更频繁的支付和延迟支付保费而增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Implementation of an Adjusted Relative Strength Index Model in the Foreign Currency and Energy Markets of Emerging and Developed Economies Commerce, Religion, and the Rule of Law A Financial Macro-Network Approach to Climate Policy Evaluation Cooperatives As Hybrid Approach to Pull Off Sustainable Development and Livelihoods: An Analytical Review The National Credit Act’s Remedies for Reckless Credit in the Mortgage Context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1