Postmodern Discourse and Its Semiosis

K. Hakobyan, Jasmina Šuler-Galos
{"title":"Postmodern Discourse and Its Semiosis","authors":"K. Hakobyan, Jasmina Šuler-Galos","doi":"10.17323/2411-7390-2015-1-3-63-71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Symbolic representation is a specific, uniquely human form of objectification of the real world, a powerful means of communication activity of its reflectivity. Understanding of the phenomenon of sign representation, its modeling and the definition of the sign and its meaning depends on the sign language system and aspects of the language to be interpreted – dynamic or statistical, functional or structural aspects are taken as a basis. This article is an attempt to review the main components of the sign of the postmodern discourse.It should be noted that in modern science there is a tendency to revise the linguistic nature of the sign. Among all areas of linguistics there is a domination of the theoretical reflection, according to which all phenomena are regarded as the implementation of language text, discourse, narrative. Therefore, the full range of human culture is the sum of texts of the intertextuality. Consciousness also appears in the form of text that can be read by the relevant rules of grammar, or, by using the decryption of codes. Foreign linguists developed a new direction in science: the main emphasis is placed on the special role of the interpretation procedures and the importance of reading both cognitive and communicative signs, because any schematization of reality is a sign. The analysis of postmodern texts suggests that thought can not be just interpreted, but also disinterpreted in postmodern discourse. In these texts, the notion of the sign takes on a different, broader meaning than that of word mark. One of the important issues of semiotic analysis of postmodern discourse is to examine and identify the codes that exist to decipher all kinds of signs.Thus, in the context of our research the quite relevant question is to define the temporal signs (linguistic or non-linguistic) to be expressed in the postmodern discourse. As is known, the category of ‘time’ appears as a symbol of life / death, meaning as a cultural reality, and so forth. In modern linguistics it is assumed that postmodern text is regulated by a set of codes: the linguistic code of natural language, the literary code that defines the connectivity of the text, the genre code, and meta-language of a writer. In our view, the essence of postmodern discourse is a combination of mosaic codes, which include the following types of: linguistic, cultural, semiological, interactive, and metatextual codes. \n  \nThis article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.","PeriodicalId":149082,"journal":{"name":"Continental Philosophy eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Continental Philosophy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17323/2411-7390-2015-1-3-63-71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Symbolic representation is a specific, uniquely human form of objectification of the real world, a powerful means of communication activity of its reflectivity. Understanding of the phenomenon of sign representation, its modeling and the definition of the sign and its meaning depends on the sign language system and aspects of the language to be interpreted – dynamic or statistical, functional or structural aspects are taken as a basis. This article is an attempt to review the main components of the sign of the postmodern discourse.It should be noted that in modern science there is a tendency to revise the linguistic nature of the sign. Among all areas of linguistics there is a domination of the theoretical reflection, according to which all phenomena are regarded as the implementation of language text, discourse, narrative. Therefore, the full range of human culture is the sum of texts of the intertextuality. Consciousness also appears in the form of text that can be read by the relevant rules of grammar, or, by using the decryption of codes. Foreign linguists developed a new direction in science: the main emphasis is placed on the special role of the interpretation procedures and the importance of reading both cognitive and communicative signs, because any schematization of reality is a sign. The analysis of postmodern texts suggests that thought can not be just interpreted, but also disinterpreted in postmodern discourse. In these texts, the notion of the sign takes on a different, broader meaning than that of word mark. One of the important issues of semiotic analysis of postmodern discourse is to examine and identify the codes that exist to decipher all kinds of signs.Thus, in the context of our research the quite relevant question is to define the temporal signs (linguistic or non-linguistic) to be expressed in the postmodern discourse. As is known, the category of ‘time’ appears as a symbol of life / death, meaning as a cultural reality, and so forth. In modern linguistics it is assumed that postmodern text is regulated by a set of codes: the linguistic code of natural language, the literary code that defines the connectivity of the text, the genre code, and meta-language of a writer. In our view, the essence of postmodern discourse is a combination of mosaic codes, which include the following types of: linguistic, cultural, semiological, interactive, and metatextual codes.   This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
后现代话语及其符号学
符号再现是人类对现实世界的一种特定的、独特的客观化形式,是其反射率的一种强有力的传播活动手段。对符号表征现象的理解、对其建模以及对符号及其含义的定义取决于手语系统和要解释的语言的各个方面——以动态或统计、功能或结构方面为基础。本文试图回顾后现代话语符号的主要组成部分。应该指出的是,在现代科学中,有一种修正符号的语言性质的倾向。在语言学的所有领域中,理论反思占主导地位,根据理论反思,所有现象都被视为语言文本、话语、叙事的实施。因此,人类文化的全部内容就是互文性文本的总和。意识也以文本的形式出现,这些文本可以通过相关的语法规则或使用密码解密来阅读。外国语言学家在科学上发展了一个新的方向:主要强调解释过程的特殊作用和阅读认知和交际符号的重要性,因为任何对现实的图式都是一种符号。对后现代文本的分析表明,在后现代话语中,思想不仅可以被解释,而且可以被解构。在这些文本中,符号的概念比文字标记具有不同的、更广泛的含义。后现代话语符号学分析的一个重要问题是检查和识别存在的用于破译各种符号的符码。因此,在我们的研究背景下,相当相关的问题是定义后现代话语中要表达的时间符号(语言或非语言)。众所周知,“时间”这一范畴是作为生/死的象征出现的,是作为文化现实出现的意义,等等。在现代语言学中,后现代文本被假定为一套规范:自然语言的语言规范、定义文本连通性的文学规范、体裁规范和作家的元语言。在我们看来,后现代话语的本质是一种马赛克密码的组合,它包括以下几种类型:语言密码、文化密码、符号学密码、互动密码和元文本密码。本文基于知识共享署名4.0国际许可协议发布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
I Choose for Myself, Therefore I Am: The Contours of Existentialist Welfare Economics Nietzsche's Naturalism: Neither Liberal nor Illiberal Interdisciplinarity in Research Evaluation The Concept of Hegemony The Neoliberal Politics of 'Smart': Electricity Consumption, Household Monitoring, and the Enterprise Form
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1