Iceland’s External Affairs from the Napoleonic Era to the occupation of Denmark: Danish and British Shelter

Baldur Þórhallsson, T. Joensen
{"title":"Iceland’s External Affairs from the Napoleonic Era to the occupation of Denmark: Danish and British Shelter","authors":"Baldur Þórhallsson, T. Joensen","doi":"10.13177/IRPA.A.2015.11.2.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper argues that Iceland enjoyed essential shelter, for its development and prosperity, provided by Denmark and Britain. Societal relations with Copenhagen were of fundamental importance in the preservation and evolution of Icelandic identity and culture, providing the foundation of the modern society and leading to the establishment of the Icelandic state. Danish financial backups created the basis for the island’s economic prosperity in the 20th century. Moreover, Denmark provided partial political shelter in terms of significant diplomatic support in guaranteeing trade agreements with other states. Also, Denmark led by example and Iceland followed its foreign policy. On the other hand, Denmark failed to provide Iceland with protection of its land and waters and economic cover when it was in most need. Moreover, the economic cover it did provide was, at times, highly costly. Denmark had been downgraded to a small European power in the post-Napoleonic period. In practice, Britain was in control over the North Atlantic. It guaranteed Iceland’s neutrality and connection to the outside world and markets when the Danish authorities failed in these areas, as long as British interests were also served. Nor did British protection come without cost. Accordingly, this paper confirms the common claim of small-state studies that small states are at the mercy of their larger neighbours. Moreover, our findings indicate that Iceland’s growing autonomy did not affect its need for political, economic and societal cover.","PeriodicalId":294103,"journal":{"name":"Icelandic Review of Politics and Administration","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Icelandic Review of Politics and Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13177/IRPA.A.2015.11.2.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper argues that Iceland enjoyed essential shelter, for its development and prosperity, provided by Denmark and Britain. Societal relations with Copenhagen were of fundamental importance in the preservation and evolution of Icelandic identity and culture, providing the foundation of the modern society and leading to the establishment of the Icelandic state. Danish financial backups created the basis for the island’s economic prosperity in the 20th century. Moreover, Denmark provided partial political shelter in terms of significant diplomatic support in guaranteeing trade agreements with other states. Also, Denmark led by example and Iceland followed its foreign policy. On the other hand, Denmark failed to provide Iceland with protection of its land and waters and economic cover when it was in most need. Moreover, the economic cover it did provide was, at times, highly costly. Denmark had been downgraded to a small European power in the post-Napoleonic period. In practice, Britain was in control over the North Atlantic. It guaranteed Iceland’s neutrality and connection to the outside world and markets when the Danish authorities failed in these areas, as long as British interests were also served. Nor did British protection come without cost. Accordingly, this paper confirms the common claim of small-state studies that small states are at the mercy of their larger neighbours. Moreover, our findings indicate that Iceland’s growing autonomy did not affect its need for political, economic and societal cover.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从拿破仑时代到丹麦被占领的冰岛外交:丹麦和英国的庇护
本文认为,丹麦和英国为冰岛的发展和繁荣提供了必要的庇护。与哥本哈根的社会关系对于冰岛身份和文化的保存和演变具有根本的重要性,为现代社会提供了基础,并导致了冰岛国家的建立。丹麦的财政支持为该岛在20世纪的经济繁荣奠定了基础。此外,丹麦在保证与其他国家达成贸易协定方面提供了重要的外交支持,从而提供了部分政治庇护。此外,丹麦以身作则,冰岛遵循其外交政策。另一方面,丹麦未能在冰岛最需要的时候为其土地和水域提供保护和经济保障。此外,它所提供的经济保障有时代价高昂。在后拿破仑时期,丹麦已沦为欧洲小国。实际上,英国控制着北大西洋。当丹麦当局在这些领域失败时,它保证了冰岛的中立性和与外部世界和市场的联系,只要英国的利益也得到了满足。英国的保护并非没有代价。因此,本文证实了小国研究的共同主张,即小国受其较大邻国的支配。此外,我们的研究结果表明,冰岛日益增长的自治权并没有影响其对政治、经济和社会覆盖的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Word I Hate: Racism, Refugees and Asylum Seekers in Iceland Leadership for experts: First among equals Tourists and municipal finance Young people’s views on political participation The opening of Costco in Iceland: Unexpected meanings of globalized phenomenon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1