Soft Pillows and the Near and Dear: Physical-to-Abstract Mappings with Image-Schematic Metaphors

J. Hurtienne, Oliver Meschke
{"title":"Soft Pillows and the Near and Dear: Physical-to-Abstract Mappings with Image-Schematic Metaphors","authors":"J. Hurtienne, Oliver Meschke","doi":"10.1145/2839462.2839483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For interaction designers who need systematic and universal guidelines on how to express abstract meaning via the physical and spatial means of tangible user interfaces, image-schematic metaphors have been shown to be a promising approach. Rooted in the embodied status of human cognition, image-schematic metaphors generate many candidates for population stereotypes of physical-to-abstract mappings. In an empirical study complementing earlier research 80 participants matched tangible objects with abstract keywords derived from 30 image-schematic metaphors of the image schemas UP-DOWN, FRONT-BACK, NEAR-FAR, HARD-SOFT, STRONG-WEAK and STRAIGHT-CROOKED. On average, 77% of the participants' responses were consistent with the metaphors, and 19 metaphors received agreement rates of at least 80% suggesting these to be valid population stereotypes. As agreement rates vary dependent on context and image schema instantiation, conclusions for further studies are drawn.","PeriodicalId":422083,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the TEI '16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the TEI '16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2839462.2839483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

For interaction designers who need systematic and universal guidelines on how to express abstract meaning via the physical and spatial means of tangible user interfaces, image-schematic metaphors have been shown to be a promising approach. Rooted in the embodied status of human cognition, image-schematic metaphors generate many candidates for population stereotypes of physical-to-abstract mappings. In an empirical study complementing earlier research 80 participants matched tangible objects with abstract keywords derived from 30 image-schematic metaphors of the image schemas UP-DOWN, FRONT-BACK, NEAR-FAR, HARD-SOFT, STRONG-WEAK and STRAIGHT-CROOKED. On average, 77% of the participants' responses were consistent with the metaphors, and 19 metaphors received agreement rates of at least 80% suggesting these to be valid population stereotypes. As agreement rates vary dependent on context and image schema instantiation, conclusions for further studies are drawn.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
柔软的枕头和亲近的和亲爱的:物理到抽象的映射与图像示意图隐喻
对于交互设计师来说,他们需要系统和通用的指导方针来指导如何通过有形的用户界面的物理和空间手段来表达抽象的含义,图像示意图隐喻已经被证明是一种很有前途的方法。基于人类认知的具身状态,图像图式隐喻产生了许多实体到抽象映射的人口刻板印象的候选者。在一项补充先前研究的实证研究中,80名参与者将有形物体与抽象关键词进行匹配,这些抽象关键词来自于向上-向下、前后、近远、硬-软、强-弱和直-弯的图像图式中的30个图像图式隐喻。平均而言,77%的参与者的回答与隐喻一致,有19个隐喻的一致性至少达到80%,这表明这些隐喻是有效的群体刻板印象。由于语境和意象图式实例化会影响一致性,因此得出了进一步研究的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Session details: What Your Body Can Do For You Gleamy: An Ambient Display Lamp with a Transparency-Controllable Shade Inner Garden: an Augmented Sandbox Designed for Self-Reflection Modifying Gesture Elicitation: Do Kinaesthetic Priming and Increased Production Reduce Legacy Bias? Stereo Haptics: Designing Haptic Interactions using Audio Tools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1