Modeling the ecohydrological processes in the Landes de Gascogne, SW France

A. Govind, J. Bonnefond, J. Kumari, C. Moisy, D. Loustau, J. Wigneron
{"title":"Modeling the ecohydrological processes in the Landes de Gascogne, SW France","authors":"A. Govind, J. Bonnefond, J. Kumari, C. Moisy, D. Loustau, J. Wigneron","doi":"10.1109/PMA.2012.6524824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we simulated the ecohydrological processes of a landscape that comprises of managed maritime pine stands and crops, in a spatially explicit manner. We used various spatio-temporal datasets to run the STEPS model that describes ecophysiological, biogeochemicaland hydrological processes in a tightly coupled manner. The simulated gross primary productivity (GPP) and evapotranspiration (ET) showed large spatial variability over this landscape owing to the heterogeneities in landcover, soil texture, topography and soil hydrology. Croplands exhibited higher magnitudes of GPP (200–2500 gCm−2 yr−1) and ET fluxes (150–800 mm yr−1) in comparison to other landcover types. Maize (C4) is generally cultivated in this landscape that is managed in terms of optimal availability of water and nutrients. The spatial variability was huge in the croplands due to the presence of fallow vs. cultivated lands. The maritime pine stands also showed considerable spatial variability in GPP (426 to 1320 gCm−2 yr−1) and ET (234 to 570 mm yr−1) because of their stand ages (and the LAI) and depending on the nature of their understory species compositions. It was found that the understory contributions to the stand scale annual GPP and annual ET as much as 27% and 34%, respectively. The comparison of the simulated daily values with the measurements taken at the LeBray eddy covariance site (a maritime pine stand) revealed that the model performance were reasonable for both GPP (R2= 0.92, RMSE= 0.77 gC m−2 day−1) and ET (r2=0.81, RMSE= 0.52 mm day−1). The seasonal patterns of ET fluxes were more dynamic than GPP due to the presence of distinct subcomponent processes that were uniquely governed by environmental factors.","PeriodicalId":117786,"journal":{"name":"2012 IEEE 4th International Symposium on Plant Growth Modeling, Simulation, Visualization and Applications","volume":"763 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 IEEE 4th International Symposium on Plant Growth Modeling, Simulation, Visualization and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PMA.2012.6524824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

In this study, we simulated the ecohydrological processes of a landscape that comprises of managed maritime pine stands and crops, in a spatially explicit manner. We used various spatio-temporal datasets to run the STEPS model that describes ecophysiological, biogeochemicaland hydrological processes in a tightly coupled manner. The simulated gross primary productivity (GPP) and evapotranspiration (ET) showed large spatial variability over this landscape owing to the heterogeneities in landcover, soil texture, topography and soil hydrology. Croplands exhibited higher magnitudes of GPP (200–2500 gCm−2 yr−1) and ET fluxes (150–800 mm yr−1) in comparison to other landcover types. Maize (C4) is generally cultivated in this landscape that is managed in terms of optimal availability of water and nutrients. The spatial variability was huge in the croplands due to the presence of fallow vs. cultivated lands. The maritime pine stands also showed considerable spatial variability in GPP (426 to 1320 gCm−2 yr−1) and ET (234 to 570 mm yr−1) because of their stand ages (and the LAI) and depending on the nature of their understory species compositions. It was found that the understory contributions to the stand scale annual GPP and annual ET as much as 27% and 34%, respectively. The comparison of the simulated daily values with the measurements taken at the LeBray eddy covariance site (a maritime pine stand) revealed that the model performance were reasonable for both GPP (R2= 0.92, RMSE= 0.77 gC m−2 day−1) and ET (r2=0.81, RMSE= 0.52 mm day−1). The seasonal patterns of ET fluxes were more dynamic than GPP due to the presence of distinct subcomponent processes that were uniquely governed by environmental factors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模拟法国西南部加斯科涅地区的生态水文过程
在这项研究中,我们以空间明确的方式模拟了由管理的海松林和作物组成的景观的生态水文过程。我们使用不同的时空数据集来运行STEPS模型,该模型以紧密耦合的方式描述了生态生理、生物地球化学和水文过程。由于地表覆盖、土壤质地、地形和土壤水文的异质性,模拟的总初级生产力(GPP)和蒸散发(ET)表现出较大的空间变异性。与其他土地覆盖类型相比,农田表现出更高的GPP (200-2500 gCm−2 yr−1)和ET通量(150-800 mm yr−1)。玉米(C4)通常在这种景观中种植,并根据最佳水分和养分供应进行管理。由于耕地和休耕地的存在,耕地的空间变异性很大。海松林分的GPP (426 ~ 1320 gCm−2 yr−1)和ET (234 ~ 570 mm yr−1)也因林龄(和LAI)和林下物种组成的性质而表现出相当大的空间变动性。林下植被对林分尺度年GPP和年ET的贡献率分别高达27%和34%。将模拟的日值与LeBray涡动相关站点(海上松林)的测量值进行比较,结果表明,模型对GPP (R2= 0.92, RMSE= 0.77 gC m−2 day−1)和ET (R2= 0.81, RMSE= 0.52 mm day−1)的性能都是合理的。由于存在独特的受环境因子控制的子组分过程,蒸散发通量的季节模式比GPP更具动态性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamical feedback between circadian clock and carbohydrate availability explains adaptive response of starch metabolism to longer night Investigating the influence of geometrical traits on light interception efficiency of apple trees: A modelling study with MAppleT A plastic, dynamic and reducible 3D geometric model for simulating gramineous leaves Modeling the environmental and seasonal influence on canopy dynamic and litterfall of even-aged forest ecosystems by a model coupling growth & yield and process-based approaches Assessment of the Role of initial conditions in the setting of heterogeneity of functional Traits in a population of oilseed rape plants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1