Logics of Educational Stratification: A Cross-National Map of Educational Inequality

ISRN Education Pub Date : 2012-03-26 DOI:10.5402/2012/109647
Raphaela Schlicht-Schmälzle, Kathrin Ackermann
{"title":"Logics of Educational Stratification: A Cross-National Map of Educational Inequality","authors":"Raphaela Schlicht-Schmälzle, Kathrin Ackermann","doi":"10.5402/2012/109647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Equality of education is often seen as the fundament of the overall equality of opportunity in modern societies. However, no reliable and comprehensive cross-national comparison of educational inequality hitherto exists. The aim of the present paper is to provide a cross-national comparative outline of diverse dimensions of educational inequality in the OECD world. We estimate the effects of three highly influential aspects of socioeconomic background on educational achievement in each OECD country in order to create a ranking of educational inequality in 30 capitalist countries. The central finding is that we indeed cannot identify a single cross-national ranking but three dimensions of education inequality: educational inequality based on economic, educational, and migration background at home. Capitalist economies thus do not only differ with regard to the degree of inequality but, first and foremost concerning the predominant patterns of inequality and the main distributive keys.","PeriodicalId":202265,"journal":{"name":"ISRN Education","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/109647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Equality of education is often seen as the fundament of the overall equality of opportunity in modern societies. However, no reliable and comprehensive cross-national comparison of educational inequality hitherto exists. The aim of the present paper is to provide a cross-national comparative outline of diverse dimensions of educational inequality in the OECD world. We estimate the effects of three highly influential aspects of socioeconomic background on educational achievement in each OECD country in order to create a ranking of educational inequality in 30 capitalist countries. The central finding is that we indeed cannot identify a single cross-national ranking but three dimensions of education inequality: educational inequality based on economic, educational, and migration background at home. Capitalist economies thus do not only differ with regard to the degree of inequality but, first and foremost concerning the predominant patterns of inequality and the main distributive keys.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育分层的逻辑:教育不平等的跨国地图
教育平等通常被视为现代社会整体机会平等的基础。然而,到目前为止,还没有对教育不平等进行可靠和全面的跨国比较。本论文的目的是提供经合组织世界教育不平等的不同维度的跨国比较大纲。我们估计了社会经济背景对每个经合组织国家教育成就的三个高度影响方面的影响,以便在30个资本主义国家中建立教育不平等的排名。研究的核心发现是,我们确实不能确定单一的跨国排名,而是确定教育不平等的三个维度:基于国内经济、教育和移民背景的教育不平等。因此,资本主义经济不仅在不平等程度上有所不同,而且首先在不平等的主要模式和主要分配关键方面有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Inquiry-Based Education for Students with Visual Impairment Comparison of Teacher Motivation for Mathematics and Special Educators in Middle Schools That Have and Have Not Achieved AYP Considering District and School Factors and Their Relationship to ACT Performance in North Carolina: An Examination of the ACT Pilot Results Caring for Students: What Teachers Have to Say Tool Use in Computer-Based Learning Environments: Adopting and Extending the Technology Acceptance Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1