Who Uses the Moral Panic Concept? A Bibliometric Analysis of Moral Panic Scientific Literature

Oxana R. Mikhaylova
{"title":"Who Uses the Moral Panic Concept? A Bibliometric Analysis of Moral Panic Scientific Literature","authors":"Oxana R. Mikhaylova","doi":"10.17323/1728-192x-2020-3-351-375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the bibliometric approach was used for the investigation of the research field\norganized around the concept of moral panic. To examine the current condition of the moral panic field, we analyzed the papers published in the WoS from 1972–2019. As a result of our study, the thematic areas, and the most influential actors in the field were revealed and described. Today, the moral panic filed is dominated by sociologists. Among the leaders in terms of citations are authors from financially-developed countries. This shows that there is economic inequality in the production of papers. The most cited are publications devoted to online studies. The results of this research demonstrate that there is no noticeable erosion among the empirical contexts, where the concept is used because children and youth are still the most popular object of moral panic studies. They are the classical objects for moral panic papers. At the same time, it could be argued that this field is still in the process of development because the theoretical and empirical papers that prevail are connected with the integration of the moral panic theory with other theories and concepts. We suppose this approach to the conceptual analysis developed in this paper could be useful for the revision of other fields developed around controversial concepts in sociology.","PeriodicalId":137616,"journal":{"name":"The Russian Sociological Review","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Russian Sociological Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17323/1728-192x-2020-3-351-375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this paper, the bibliometric approach was used for the investigation of the research field organized around the concept of moral panic. To examine the current condition of the moral panic field, we analyzed the papers published in the WoS from 1972–2019. As a result of our study, the thematic areas, and the most influential actors in the field were revealed and described. Today, the moral panic filed is dominated by sociologists. Among the leaders in terms of citations are authors from financially-developed countries. This shows that there is economic inequality in the production of papers. The most cited are publications devoted to online studies. The results of this research demonstrate that there is no noticeable erosion among the empirical contexts, where the concept is used because children and youth are still the most popular object of moral panic studies. They are the classical objects for moral panic papers. At the same time, it could be argued that this field is still in the process of development because the theoretical and empirical papers that prevail are connected with the integration of the moral panic theory with other theories and concepts. We suppose this approach to the conceptual analysis developed in this paper could be useful for the revision of other fields developed around controversial concepts in sociology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谁在使用道德恐慌的概念?道德恐慌科学文献计量学分析
本文采用文献计量学方法对围绕道德恐慌概念组织的研究领域进行了调查。为了考察道德恐慌领域的现状,我们分析了1972-2019年发表在《世界卫生组织》上的论文。作为我们研究的结果,揭示和描述了该领域的主题领域和最具影响力的行动者。今天,道德恐慌领域由社会学家主导。被引用次数最多的是来自经济发达国家的作者。这表明在纸张生产中存在经济不平等。被引用最多的是致力于在线研究的出版物。本研究的结果表明,在使用这个概念的经验背景中,没有明显的侵蚀,因为儿童和青少年仍然是道德恐慌研究的最受欢迎的对象。他们是道德恐慌论文的经典对象。同时,可以认为这一领域仍处于发展过程中,因为主流的理论和实证论文都与道德恐慌理论与其他理论和概念的整合有关。我们认为,本文中发展的这种概念分析方法可能有助于修改围绕社会学中有争议概念发展的其他领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Spontaneous order and relational sociology: from the Scottish Enlightenment to human figurations Defining the Russian Diasporic Home and Its Atmospheres: Theoretical Challenges and the Methodological Implications The Emergence of Borders: Moral Questions Mapped Out The dualism of human nature and its social conditions Art as a Cultural System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1