Comparison of rule based classification techniques for the Arabic textual data

F. Thabtah, Omar Gharaibeh, Hussein Abdeljaber
{"title":"Comparison of rule based classification techniques for the Arabic textual data","authors":"F. Thabtah, Omar Gharaibeh, Hussein Abdeljaber","doi":"10.1109/ISIICT.2011.6149604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Text categorisation discipline has recently attracted many scholars because of the large number of documents on the World Wide Web (WWW) that contain hidden useful information which can be utilised by organisational's managers for decision making. However, the majority of research conducted in text categorisation is related to English data collections while there is limited research attempts conducted on mining corpuses in Arabic. This paper investigates the problem of Arabic text categorisation in order to measure the performance of different rule based classification data mining techniques. Precisely, four different rule based classification approaches: C4.5, RIPPER, PART, and OneRule are compared against the known CCA Arabic text data set. Experiments are carried out using a modified version of WEKA business intelligence tool, and the results determine that the least suitable classification algorithms for classifying Arabic texts is OneRule whereas RIPPER, C4.5 and PART have similar performance with respect to error rate.","PeriodicalId":266498,"journal":{"name":"International Symposium on Innovations in Information and Communications Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Symposium on Innovations in Information and Communications Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIICT.2011.6149604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Text categorisation discipline has recently attracted many scholars because of the large number of documents on the World Wide Web (WWW) that contain hidden useful information which can be utilised by organisational's managers for decision making. However, the majority of research conducted in text categorisation is related to English data collections while there is limited research attempts conducted on mining corpuses in Arabic. This paper investigates the problem of Arabic text categorisation in order to measure the performance of different rule based classification data mining techniques. Precisely, four different rule based classification approaches: C4.5, RIPPER, PART, and OneRule are compared against the known CCA Arabic text data set. Experiments are carried out using a modified version of WEKA business intelligence tool, and the results determine that the least suitable classification algorithms for classifying Arabic texts is OneRule whereas RIPPER, C4.5 and PART have similar performance with respect to error rate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于规则的阿拉伯文本数据分类技术比较
由于万维网(WWW)上的大量文档包含隐藏的有用信息,这些信息可以被组织管理者用于决策,文本分类学科近年来吸引了许多学者的关注。然而,在文本分类方面进行的大多数研究与英语数据收集有关,而在阿拉伯语挖掘语料库方面进行的研究尝试有限。本文研究了阿拉伯语文本分类问题,以衡量不同的基于规则的分类数据挖掘技术的性能。准确地说,四种不同的基于规则的分类方法:C4.5、RIPPER、PART和OneRule与已知的CCA阿拉伯文本数据集进行了比较。使用改进版本的WEKA商业智能工具进行实验,结果表明,最不适合对阿拉伯语文本进行分类的分类算法是OneRule,而RIPPER、C4.5和PART在错误率方面具有相似的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From UML statecharts diagrams to labeled Generalized Stochastic Petri Net models using graph transformation Allpass-based design, multiplierless realization and implementation of IIR wavelet filter banks with approximate linear phase Reexamining database keyword search: Beyond performance A methodology for AUML role modeling Using lexicographic preorder for pareto search in QoS-aware web service composition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1