{"title":"Adoption, Abortion, and Ambivalence: Processing the Dobbs Decision","authors":"Cynthia Callahan","doi":"10.1353/ado.0.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay explores the consequences of the Dobbs decision through the author’s ambivalence about the concept of choice. It weighs conflicting uses of choice to conclude that eschewing rights in favor of choice not only undermined abortion rights, it perpetuated inequities among American families and, finally, sustained simplistic perceptions of adoption that damage the project of adoption studies.","PeriodicalId":140707,"journal":{"name":"Adoption & Culture","volume":"223 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adoption & Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ado.0.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This essay explores the consequences of the Dobbs decision through the author’s ambivalence about the concept of choice. It weighs conflicting uses of choice to conclude that eschewing rights in favor of choice not only undermined abortion rights, it perpetuated inequities among American families and, finally, sustained simplistic perceptions of adoption that damage the project of adoption studies.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
