Four questions that determine whether traffic management is reasonable

S. Jordan
{"title":"Four questions that determine whether traffic management is reasonable","authors":"S. Jordan","doi":"10.1109/INM.2009.5188801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As part of the wider debate over net neutrality, traffic management practices of Internet Service Providers have become an issue of public concern. The Federal Communications Commission has asked for public input on whether deep packet inspection and other traffic management practices are reasonable forms of network management. Little attention has been paid to this issue within the academic networking community, and most Internet policy researchers have recommended a case-by-case analysis. This paper proposes four questions that can be used to determine whether a traffic management practice is reasonable or unreasonable.","PeriodicalId":332206,"journal":{"name":"2009 IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INM.2009.5188801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

As part of the wider debate over net neutrality, traffic management practices of Internet Service Providers have become an issue of public concern. The Federal Communications Commission has asked for public input on whether deep packet inspection and other traffic management practices are reasonable forms of network management. Little attention has been paid to this issue within the academic networking community, and most Internet policy researchers have recommended a case-by-case analysis. This paper proposes four questions that can be used to determine whether a traffic management practice is reasonable or unreasonable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
决定交通管理是否合理的四个问题
作为关于网络中立性的广泛辩论的一部分,互联网服务提供商的流量管理实践已成为公众关注的问题。美国联邦通信委员会(Federal Communications Commission)已要求公众就深度数据包检测和其他流量管理实践是否属于合理的网络管理形式征求意见。学术界对这个问题的关注很少,大多数互联网政策研究人员都建议具体问题具体分析。本文提出了四个问题,可以用来确定交通管理实践是否合理或不合理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Policy-based self-management of wireless ad hoc networks A latency-aware algorithm for dynamic service placement in large-scale overlays A rule-based distributed system for self-optimization of constrained devices An efficient spectrum management mechanism for cognitive radio networks CHANGEMINER: A solution for discovering IT change templates from past execution traces
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1