Did Using Input Vouchers Improve the Distribution of Subsidized Fertilizer in Nigeria? The Case of Kano and Taraba States

L. Liverpool‐Tasie
{"title":"Did Using Input Vouchers Improve the Distribution of Subsidized Fertilizer in Nigeria? The Case of Kano and Taraba States","authors":"L. Liverpool‐Tasie","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2197524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Though input vouchers are increasingly being used as a mechanism to target subsidies in developing countries, limited empirical evidence of their performance relative to other distribution mechanisms exist. Consequently this study contributes to this scarce literature by comparing an input voucher program piloted in Nigeria in 2009 to the previous government led distribution mechanism. Input purchase experiences are compared when subsidized fertilizer was distributed through a voucher program or by the government. Using propensity score matching techniques, the study finds that voucher program participants received more bags of subsidized fertilizer than nonparticipants and paid a price significantly lower than the market price. However, they received their fertilizer later than nonparticipants and where significant had more underweight bags than nonparticipants. Given the costs associated with voucher programs, this study demonstrates when the distribution of subsidized fertilizer via vouchers improved farmers’ timely access to good and more affordable fertilizer.","PeriodicalId":389672,"journal":{"name":"International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) Discussion Paper Series","volume":"539 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) Discussion Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2197524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Though input vouchers are increasingly being used as a mechanism to target subsidies in developing countries, limited empirical evidence of their performance relative to other distribution mechanisms exist. Consequently this study contributes to this scarce literature by comparing an input voucher program piloted in Nigeria in 2009 to the previous government led distribution mechanism. Input purchase experiences are compared when subsidized fertilizer was distributed through a voucher program or by the government. Using propensity score matching techniques, the study finds that voucher program participants received more bags of subsidized fertilizer than nonparticipants and paid a price significantly lower than the market price. However, they received their fertilizer later than nonparticipants and where significant had more underweight bags than nonparticipants. Given the costs associated with voucher programs, this study demonstrates when the distribution of subsidized fertilizer via vouchers improved farmers’ timely access to good and more affordable fertilizer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
投入凭证是否改善了尼日利亚补贴肥料的分配?卡诺州和塔拉巴州案例
虽然投入券越来越多地被用作发展中国家补贴目标的一种机制,但与其他分配机制相比,其绩效的经验证据有限。因此,本研究通过比较2009年在尼日利亚试点的投入券计划与之前政府主导的分配机制,为这一稀缺文献做出了贡献。比较了通过代金券计划或由政府发放补贴肥料的投入物购买经验。通过使用倾向得分匹配技术,研究发现代金券计划的参与者比非参与者获得了更多的补贴肥料袋,并且支付的价格明显低于市场价格。然而,他们收到肥料的时间比没有参加的人晚,而且显著的地方比没有参加的人有更多的体重不足的袋子。考虑到与代金券计划相关的成本,本研究表明,通过代金券发放补贴肥料可以改善农民€™及时获得优质和更实惠的肥料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does Freer Trade Really Lead to Productivity Growth? Evidence from Africa Can Information Help Reduce Imbalanced Application of Fertilizers in India? Experimental Evidence from Bihar Financial Constraints and International Trade with Endogenous Mode of Competition Moving in the Right Direction? Maize Productivity and Fertilizer Use and Use Intensity in Ghana Links between Tenure Security and Food Security: Evidence from Ethiopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1