The service revolution and its marketing implications: service logic vs service-dominant logic

C. Grönroos, Johanna Gummerus
{"title":"The service revolution and its marketing implications: service logic vs service-dominant logic","authors":"C. Grönroos, Johanna Gummerus","doi":"10.1108/MSQ-03-2014-0042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – The purpose of this conceptual paper is to analyse the implications generated by a service perspective. Design/methodology/approach – A conceptual analysis of two approaches to understanding service perspectives, service logic (SL) and service-dominant logic (SDL), reveals direct and indirect marketing implications. Findings – The SDL is based on a metaphorical view of co-creation and value co-creation, in which the firm, customers and other actors participate in the process that leads to value for customers. The approach is firm-driven; the service provider drives value creation. The managerial implications are not service perspective-based, and co-creation may be imprisoned by its metaphor. In contrast, SL takes an analytical approach, with co-creation concepts that can significantly reinvent marketing from a service perspective. Value gets created in customer processes, and value creation is customer driven. Ten managerial SL principles derived from these analyses offer theoretical and practi...","PeriodicalId":313036,"journal":{"name":"Managing Service Quality","volume":"125 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"407","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managing Service Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/MSQ-03-2014-0042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 407

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this conceptual paper is to analyse the implications generated by a service perspective. Design/methodology/approach – A conceptual analysis of two approaches to understanding service perspectives, service logic (SL) and service-dominant logic (SDL), reveals direct and indirect marketing implications. Findings – The SDL is based on a metaphorical view of co-creation and value co-creation, in which the firm, customers and other actors participate in the process that leads to value for customers. The approach is firm-driven; the service provider drives value creation. The managerial implications are not service perspective-based, and co-creation may be imprisoned by its metaphor. In contrast, SL takes an analytical approach, with co-creation concepts that can significantly reinvent marketing from a service perspective. Value gets created in customer processes, and value creation is customer driven. Ten managerial SL principles derived from these analyses offer theoretical and practi...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
服务革命及其营销含义:服务逻辑vs服务主导逻辑
目的-这篇概念性论文的目的是分析服务视角所产生的含义。设计/方法论/方法——对服务逻辑(SL)和服务主导逻辑(SDL)这两种理解服务前景的方法进行概念分析,揭示了直接和间接的营销含义。发现——SDL基于共同创造和价值共同创造的隐喻性观点,在这种观点中,公司、客户和其他行为者参与了为客户带来价值的过程。这种方法是由公司驱动的;服务提供商驱动价值创造。管理含义不是基于服务视角的,共同创造可能被它的隐喻所禁锢。相比之下,SL采用分析方法,其共同创造的概念可以从服务的角度显著地重塑营销。价值是在客户过程中创造的,价值创造是由客户驱动的。从这些分析中得出的十条管理SL原则提供了理论和实践…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Addressing complexity and taking a systemic view in service research Research traditions of innovation: Goods-dominant logic, the resource-based approach, and service-dominant logic The collective consumption network Beyond virtuality: from engagement platforms to engagement ecosystems Theory of value co-creation: a systematic literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1