Are there first-mover advantages in B2B ecommerce technologies?

G. J. Hidding, Jeffrey R. Williams
{"title":"Are there first-mover advantages in B2B ecommerce technologies?","authors":"G. J. Hidding, Jeffrey R. Williams","doi":"10.1109/HICSS.2003.1174387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, \"dot-com \" startups relied on the well-known concept of \"first-mover advantage\" to justify huge marketing expenses and large financial losses. The idea was that once the firm had gathered customers, it would keep those customers because it had a first-mover advantage. But was that assumption valid? We analyzed whether first-mover advantage actually occurred in 19 information technology product categories that enable B2B ecommerce (and 6 that enable B2C ecommerce). Consistent with earlier studies in other industries, we found that, in half the product categories, the current leaders were among the first three entrants. However, we identified an important refinement. In at least 80% of the product categories in our sample, the first movers lost their initial advantage. This paper presents detailed results, including pioneer lead times and leader lag. It also presents implications for strategic management practitioners, as well as suggestions for further research.","PeriodicalId":159242,"journal":{"name":"36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2003.1174387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Recently, "dot-com " startups relied on the well-known concept of "first-mover advantage" to justify huge marketing expenses and large financial losses. The idea was that once the firm had gathered customers, it would keep those customers because it had a first-mover advantage. But was that assumption valid? We analyzed whether first-mover advantage actually occurred in 19 information technology product categories that enable B2B ecommerce (and 6 that enable B2C ecommerce). Consistent with earlier studies in other industries, we found that, in half the product categories, the current leaders were among the first three entrants. However, we identified an important refinement. In at least 80% of the product categories in our sample, the first movers lost their initial advantage. This paper presents detailed results, including pioneer lead times and leader lag. It also presents implications for strategic management practitioners, as well as suggestions for further research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
B2B电子商务技术有先发优势吗?
最近,“。com”创业公司依靠众所周知的“先发优势”概念来证明巨额营销费用和巨额财务损失是合理的。这个想法是,一旦公司聚集了客户,它就会留住这些客户,因为它有先发优势。但这个假设成立吗?我们分析了实现B2B电子商务的19个信息技术产品类别(以及6个实现B2C电子商务的信息技术产品类别)是否确实存在先发优势。与其他行业早期的研究一致,我们发现,在一半的产品类别中,目前的领导者都是前三名进入者。然而,我们确定了一个重要的改进。在我们的样本中,至少80%的产品类别中,先行者失去了最初的优势。本文给出了详细的结果,包括先锋交货时间和领先者滞后。本文也对战略管理从业者提出了启示,并对进一步的研究提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
No more shadow boxing with online music piracy: strategic business models to enhance revenues Balancing safety against performance: tradeoffs in Internet security The transitional role of institutional trust in online interorganizational relationships The development and proliferation of consensus security configuration benchmarks for systems connected to the Internet Multi-criteria task assignment in workflow management systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1