Parity May Determine Levels of Some Antioxidant Minerals in Pregnancy: An Experience From Rural South‑Eastern Nigeria

S. O. Ogbodo, A. Okaka, U. Nwagha
{"title":"Parity May Determine Levels of Some Antioxidant Minerals in Pregnancy: An Experience From Rural South‑Eastern Nigeria","authors":"S. O. Ogbodo, A. Okaka, U. Nwagha","doi":"10.4103/2278-960X.129275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Maternal micronutrient and antioxidant status is critical to fetal growth and survival. Poor socioeconomic conditions in the rural areas portend undernutrition with inevitable micronutrients deficiencies. Presently, there are conflicting reports on the serum levels of some mineral antioxidants during pregnancy. Aim: To determine the serum concentrations of some antioxidant minerals - copper and manganese, in rural pregnant women of different parities. Subjects and Methods: This is a cross‑sectional study, involving 195 rural pregnant women, in different trimesters and parities. They were recruited from antenatal clinics of some rural health centres in south‑eastern Nigeria. The controls were 50 age‑matched, nonpregnant, nulliparous, and apparently healthy women, who were not menstruating at the time of sample collection. Results : The results showed that copper was nonsignificantly lower (P = 0.14), while manganese was significantly higher (P < 0.001) in pregnant women than nonpregnant women. Over gestation, there was no significant changes (P = 0.081; F = 2.268; r2 = 0.028) in copper concentrations as pregnancy progressed while manganese increased significantly (P < 0.001; F = 18.370; r2 = 0.195), and remained relatively so, throughout gestation. However, both antioxidants increased progressively and significantly as parity increased (P < 0.001). Conclusion : Parity influences the levels of these antioxidant minerals in pregnancy and therefore should play significant role in the determination of the actual dose of supplements, if need be, of these antioxidants during pregnancy. Indeed assessment and supplementation of copper and manganese during pregnancy should be individualized to avoid deleterious fetomaternal consequences. Keywords : Copper, manganese, parity, pregnancy, rural area","PeriodicalId":356195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Reproductive Sciences","volume":"234 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Reproductive Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2278-960X.129275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Maternal micronutrient and antioxidant status is critical to fetal growth and survival. Poor socioeconomic conditions in the rural areas portend undernutrition with inevitable micronutrients deficiencies. Presently, there are conflicting reports on the serum levels of some mineral antioxidants during pregnancy. Aim: To determine the serum concentrations of some antioxidant minerals - copper and manganese, in rural pregnant women of different parities. Subjects and Methods: This is a cross‑sectional study, involving 195 rural pregnant women, in different trimesters and parities. They were recruited from antenatal clinics of some rural health centres in south‑eastern Nigeria. The controls were 50 age‑matched, nonpregnant, nulliparous, and apparently healthy women, who were not menstruating at the time of sample collection. Results : The results showed that copper was nonsignificantly lower (P = 0.14), while manganese was significantly higher (P < 0.001) in pregnant women than nonpregnant women. Over gestation, there was no significant changes (P = 0.081; F = 2.268; r2 = 0.028) in copper concentrations as pregnancy progressed while manganese increased significantly (P < 0.001; F = 18.370; r2 = 0.195), and remained relatively so, throughout gestation. However, both antioxidants increased progressively and significantly as parity increased (P < 0.001). Conclusion : Parity influences the levels of these antioxidant minerals in pregnancy and therefore should play significant role in the determination of the actual dose of supplements, if need be, of these antioxidants during pregnancy. Indeed assessment and supplementation of copper and manganese during pregnancy should be individualized to avoid deleterious fetomaternal consequences. Keywords : Copper, manganese, parity, pregnancy, rural area
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胎次可能决定怀孕期间某些抗氧化矿物质的水平:来自尼日利亚东南部农村的经验
背景:母体微量营养素和抗氧化状态对胎儿的生长和存活至关重要。农村地区恶劣的社会经济条件预示着营养不良和不可避免的微量营养素缺乏。目前,关于怀孕期间一些矿物质抗氧化剂的血清水平有相互矛盾的报道。目的:测定不同胎次农村孕妇血清中抗氧化矿物质铜、锰的浓度。对象和方法:这是一项横断面研究,涉及195名不同孕期和胎次的农村孕妇。他们是从尼日利亚东南部一些农村保健中心的产前诊所招募的。对照组为50名年龄匹配、未怀孕、未生育、明显健康的女性,她们在样本收集时没有月经。结果:孕妇铜含量低于非孕妇(P = 0.14),而锰含量高于非孕妇(P < 0.001)。妊娠期无显著变化(P = 0.081;F = 2.268;r2 = 0.028),随着妊娠的进展,铜浓度显著增高,锰浓度显著增高(P < 0.001;F = 18.370;R2 = 0.195),并且在整个妊娠期间保持相对稳定。然而,随着胎次的增加,两种抗氧化剂均呈显著性增加(P < 0.001)。结论:胎次影响怀孕期间这些抗氧化矿物质的水平,因此在确定怀孕期间这些抗氧化剂的实际补充剂量方面应发挥重要作用,如果需要的话。事实上,怀孕期间铜和锰的评估和补充应该个体化,以避免有害的母婴后果。关键词:铜、锰、胎次、妊娠、农村
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pre-implementation Genetics for Aneuploidy Interpretation in PGT-A Goals Indications and Improve Infertility Outcomes, ART, and How to Perform PGT-A Follicular Fluid Aspiration and Oocyte Retrieval Techniques, Several Flushing, Difficulty Situations Damage Risk to the Cumulus Complex and Complications Microdeletion of Y-chromosome and their high impact on male infertility Contraceptive-seeking behavior of women attending antenatal care in a developing country: A veritable tool for slowing population growth Filariasis in pregnancy: Prevalent yet less-known global health burden
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1