Obscurity of Camp Life:Is the Language of Camp ‘Passivityto Write’?

Joydip Datta
{"title":"Obscurity of Camp Life:Is the Language of Camp ‘Passivityto Write’?","authors":"Joydip Datta","doi":"10.35684/jlci.2019.6105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The meaning of camp is pivotal to understand the life of the refugee along with geopolitical ordering and the strategy of governance in present time. In the recent years, specifically in the subcontinent, the concept of camp has emerged as a tool or destination for this particular category of people. Basic concept of the camp is largely articulated through the question of refugee which is deeply connected to the Partition of India in 1947. In the same proposition the question of caste has been framed in the context of Bengal. Yet, the same question could be thought of in different manners in the same context. The question of caste could be addressed through anthropological, sociological or historical ways of understanding vis-à-vis the structure of the Hindu society. (Bose; Sanyal) This paper aims to think the question of caste spatially where Partition is seen as the ruins of past experiences. Therefore, camps considered here are not only thought of as concentration of the refugees, but it also indicates the phenomenon of caste in Bengal and explores the meaning of camp considering this reality. Later we will explicate how the existence of camp produces a distinct type of discourse which may help us to understand the question of caste in another dimension. Here the concept of camp is sociologically defined as a qualitative direction in which the concept, desire and kind of being is determined (Gasset 14). However, the paper does not consider camp as quantum of masses of the refugees (Agamben “We Refugee” 114); rather it has a specific qualitative character in which it excluded them. The reality of the camp articulated here comes from the exigency of the refugee influx after the Partition of India in 1947 and we are quite far from its systematic history. Refugee camp methodologically is conceived through the ‘language in the words’ which can be interpreted by its expression and unlike physical existence, the camp is looked at spatially. If we try to understand the phenomenon of the refugee, spatial intervention directs us to investigate the ‘as such’ regarding its existence; otherwise it can help us only to interpret the camp ontologically. The discourse of social stratification or the question of caste has largely directed the concept of equality, rights and the concepts of pure and impure. Such type of conceptualization is articulated through the experiences of discrimination of caste where historical events have been prioritized. In Bengal, Partition represents a major event in which caste consciousness plays a distinct and separate role compared to other parts of India. Spatial interrogation will direct us to the experience of caste in terms of the temporal existence of refugees and we will look forward to address the question phenomenally.","PeriodicalId":183557,"journal":{"name":"Sanglap: Journal of Literary and Cultural Inquiry","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sanglap: Journal of Literary and Cultural Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35684/jlci.2019.6105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The meaning of camp is pivotal to understand the life of the refugee along with geopolitical ordering and the strategy of governance in present time. In the recent years, specifically in the subcontinent, the concept of camp has emerged as a tool or destination for this particular category of people. Basic concept of the camp is largely articulated through the question of refugee which is deeply connected to the Partition of India in 1947. In the same proposition the question of caste has been framed in the context of Bengal. Yet, the same question could be thought of in different manners in the same context. The question of caste could be addressed through anthropological, sociological or historical ways of understanding vis-à-vis the structure of the Hindu society. (Bose; Sanyal) This paper aims to think the question of caste spatially where Partition is seen as the ruins of past experiences. Therefore, camps considered here are not only thought of as concentration of the refugees, but it also indicates the phenomenon of caste in Bengal and explores the meaning of camp considering this reality. Later we will explicate how the existence of camp produces a distinct type of discourse which may help us to understand the question of caste in another dimension. Here the concept of camp is sociologically defined as a qualitative direction in which the concept, desire and kind of being is determined (Gasset 14). However, the paper does not consider camp as quantum of masses of the refugees (Agamben “We Refugee” 114); rather it has a specific qualitative character in which it excluded them. The reality of the camp articulated here comes from the exigency of the refugee influx after the Partition of India in 1947 and we are quite far from its systematic history. Refugee camp methodologically is conceived through the ‘language in the words’ which can be interpreted by its expression and unlike physical existence, the camp is looked at spatially. If we try to understand the phenomenon of the refugee, spatial intervention directs us to investigate the ‘as such’ regarding its existence; otherwise it can help us only to interpret the camp ontologically. The discourse of social stratification or the question of caste has largely directed the concept of equality, rights and the concepts of pure and impure. Such type of conceptualization is articulated through the experiences of discrimination of caste where historical events have been prioritized. In Bengal, Partition represents a major event in which caste consciousness plays a distinct and separate role compared to other parts of India. Spatial interrogation will direct us to the experience of caste in terms of the temporal existence of refugees and we will look forward to address the question phenomenally.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
营地生活的隐晦:营地的语言是“被动写作”吗?
难民营的意义对于理解当前的难民生活、地缘政治秩序和治理策略至关重要。近年来,特别是在印度次大陆,营地的概念已经成为这类人的工具或目的地。难民营的基本概念在很大程度上是通过与1947年印度分治密切相关的难民问题来阐述的。在同样的命题中,种姓问题是在孟加拉的背景下提出的。然而,在同样的背景下,同样的问题可以用不同的方式来思考。种姓问题可以通过人类学、社会学或历史学的方式来理解-à-vis印度社会的结构。(玻色;Sanyal)这篇论文的目的是思考种姓的问题,在空间上,分区被视为过去经验的废墟。因此,这里所考虑的营地不仅被认为是难民的集中地,它还表明了孟加拉的种姓现象,并探讨了考虑到这一现实的营地的意义。稍后,我们将解释坎普的存在如何产生一种独特的话语类型,这可能有助于我们从另一个维度理解种姓问题。在这里,坎普的概念在社会学上被定义为一个定性的方向,在这个方向中,概念、欲望和存在的种类被决定(加塞特14)。然而,本文并未将难民营视为难民群体的量子(Agamben“We Refugee”114);相反,它有一种特殊的定性,把它们排除在外。这里所阐述的难民营的现实来自1947年印度分治后难民涌入的紧急情况,我们离它的系统历史相当远。从方法论上讲,难民营是通过“文字中的语言”来构思的,可以通过它的表达来解释,与物理存在不同,难民营是在空间上看的。如果我们试图理解难民的现象,那么空间干预将引导我们调查其存在的“现状”;否则,它只能帮助我们从本体论上解释营地。社会分层或种姓问题的论述在很大程度上指导了平等、权利和纯洁与不纯洁的概念。这种类型的概念化是通过种姓歧视的经验来表达的,在种姓歧视中,历史事件被优先考虑。在孟加拉,分治代表了一个重大事件,种姓意识与印度其他地区相比起着独特而独立的作用。空间审问将引导我们从难民的时间存在的角度来体验种姓,我们将期待从现象上解决这个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Book Review: Ecocriticism on the Edge: The Anthropocene as a Threshold Conceptby Timothy Human Subjects and “Green” Protestin Black African Photography at the Ninth Rencontres de Bamako A Postcolonial-Ecocritical Perspective on Modern American Literature “The Hidden Valleys of My Home”: Home, Identity, and Environmental Justice in the Select Works of Mamang Dai Environment: From a Humanities Perspective: Introductory Thoughts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1