Metrics for analyzing rich session histories

H. Goodell, Chih-Hung Chiang, C. Kelleher, A. Baumann, G. Grinstein
{"title":"Metrics for analyzing rich session histories","authors":"H. Goodell, Chih-Hung Chiang, C. Kelleher, A. Baumann, G. Grinstein","doi":"10.1145/1168149.1168160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To be most useful, evaluation metrics should be based on detailed observation and effective analysis of a full spectrum of system use. Because observation is costly, ideally we want a system to provide in-depth data collection with allied analyses of the key user interface elements. We have developed a visualization and analysis platform [1] that automatically records user actions and states at a high semantic level [2 and 3], and can be directly restored to any state. Audio and text annotations are collected and indexed to states, allowing users to comment on their current situation as they work, and/or as they review the session. These capabilities can be applied to usability evaluation of the system, describing problems they encountered, or to suggest improvements to the environment. Additionally, computed metrics are provided at each state [3, 4, and 5]. We believe that the metrics and the associated history data will allow us to deduce patterns of data exploration, to compare users, to evaluate tools, and to understand in a more automated approach the usability of the visualization system as a whole.","PeriodicalId":235801,"journal":{"name":"Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1168149.1168160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

To be most useful, evaluation metrics should be based on detailed observation and effective analysis of a full spectrum of system use. Because observation is costly, ideally we want a system to provide in-depth data collection with allied analyses of the key user interface elements. We have developed a visualization and analysis platform [1] that automatically records user actions and states at a high semantic level [2 and 3], and can be directly restored to any state. Audio and text annotations are collected and indexed to states, allowing users to comment on their current situation as they work, and/or as they review the session. These capabilities can be applied to usability evaluation of the system, describing problems they encountered, or to suggest improvements to the environment. Additionally, computed metrics are provided at each state [3, 4, and 5]. We believe that the metrics and the associated history data will allow us to deduce patterns of data exploration, to compare users, to evaluate tools, and to understand in a more automated approach the usability of the visualization system as a whole.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于分析丰富会话历史的指标
为了最有用,评估量度应该基于对系统使用的整个范围的详细观察和有效分析。因为观察是昂贵的,理想情况下,我们希望一个系统提供深入的数据收集与关键用户界面元素的相关分析。我们已经开发了一个可视化分析平台[1],可以自动记录用户的动作和状态在高语义层面[2和3],并可以直接恢复到任何状态。音频和文本注释被收集并索引到状态,允许用户在他们工作和/或回顾会话时评论他们当前的情况。这些功能可以应用于系统的可用性评估,描述他们遇到的问题,或者对环境提出改进建议。此外,在每个状态下都提供了计算指标[3、4和5]。我们相信,度量标准和相关的历史数据将允许我们推断数据探索的模式,比较用户,评估工具,并以更自动化的方法理解整个可视化系统的可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lowering the Barrier for Successful Replication and Evaluation A Nested Workflow Model for Visual Analytics Design and Validation Cognitive Stages in Visual Data Exploration Evaluating Information Visualization on Mobile Devices: Gaps and Challenges in the Empirical Evaluation Design Space Action Design Research and Visualization Design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1