Mix research methods: teaching and learning in 2nd year bachelor nursing program

S. Ismaile, Haya Alsahlia, Samina A. Khan, H. Alshehri
{"title":"Mix research methods: teaching and learning in 2nd year bachelor nursing program","authors":"S. Ismaile, Haya Alsahlia, Samina A. Khan, H. Alshehri","doi":"10.14419/IJANS.V5I2.6340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Nursing profession and its development, no doubt plays a crucial role in healthcare sectors. Students’ learning approaches are now being recognized across higher education as having a considerable effect on student achievement’ and their learning outcomes. The learning process in nursing education has always been a challenge to find pedagogical instructional methods that can engage learners actively and help the students to understand concepts for new applications in theoretical and practical situation. Purpose: The aim of this research study is to compare the effect of sequencing theory via classroom lecturing before practical clinical skill taught in laboratories and visa versa on students learning readiness and approaches. Methods: The research method of this study employed a mixed research methods by the implication of both quantitative and qualitative methods. The quantitative research method was conducted by means of two validated questionnaires. The first questionnaire used is the Self- Directed Learning Readiness Scale for Nursing Education (SDLRSNE). This is a self-reporting instrument designed to assess stu-dents' attitudes, abilities, and personality characteristics necessary for self- directed learning. The second questionnaire is the Revised two-factor version of the Study Process (R-SPQ-2F) in order to assess students’ deep or surface learning approaches. The qualitative research was conducted via students reflection on their learning experience via the use of free text comments in Blackboard Learning Management System (LMS) environment. The study sample included 97 nursing students. Students were divided into two groups A and B. Each group consisted of 47 nursing students. Results: Significant differences between group ‘A’ and group ‘B’ were found for SDLRSNE self-management, desire for learning and self-control, suggesting that self-management in group ‘A’ managed their learning better than group ‘B’. There were no significant differences in terms of learning approaches between group ‘A’ and B. Conclusion: This study highlights that students teaching and learning experiences are sensitive to learning environments. This was done through sequencing theoretical and clinical teaching and visa versa in a nursing course. Proper design of the learning environment and the availability of supportive learning tools encourage students learning and teaching experience.","PeriodicalId":311537,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Advanced Nursing Studies","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Advanced Nursing Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14419/IJANS.V5I2.6340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Nursing profession and its development, no doubt plays a crucial role in healthcare sectors. Students’ learning approaches are now being recognized across higher education as having a considerable effect on student achievement’ and their learning outcomes. The learning process in nursing education has always been a challenge to find pedagogical instructional methods that can engage learners actively and help the students to understand concepts for new applications in theoretical and practical situation. Purpose: The aim of this research study is to compare the effect of sequencing theory via classroom lecturing before practical clinical skill taught in laboratories and visa versa on students learning readiness and approaches. Methods: The research method of this study employed a mixed research methods by the implication of both quantitative and qualitative methods. The quantitative research method was conducted by means of two validated questionnaires. The first questionnaire used is the Self- Directed Learning Readiness Scale for Nursing Education (SDLRSNE). This is a self-reporting instrument designed to assess stu-dents' attitudes, abilities, and personality characteristics necessary for self- directed learning. The second questionnaire is the Revised two-factor version of the Study Process (R-SPQ-2F) in order to assess students’ deep or surface learning approaches. The qualitative research was conducted via students reflection on their learning experience via the use of free text comments in Blackboard Learning Management System (LMS) environment. The study sample included 97 nursing students. Students were divided into two groups A and B. Each group consisted of 47 nursing students. Results: Significant differences between group ‘A’ and group ‘B’ were found for SDLRSNE self-management, desire for learning and self-control, suggesting that self-management in group ‘A’ managed their learning better than group ‘B’. There were no significant differences in terms of learning approaches between group ‘A’ and B. Conclusion: This study highlights that students teaching and learning experiences are sensitive to learning environments. This was done through sequencing theoretical and clinical teaching and visa versa in a nursing course. Proper design of the learning environment and the availability of supportive learning tools encourage students learning and teaching experience.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合研究方法:护理本科二年级教学与学习
背景:护理专业及其发展,无疑在医疗保健行业中起着至关重要的作用。学生的学习方法现在在高等教育中被认为对学生的成绩和学习成果有相当大的影响。在护理教育的学习过程中,如何找到一种既能让学习者积极参与,又能帮助学生理解概念并将其应用于理论和实践的教学方法一直是一个挑战。目的:本研究的目的是比较在实验室教授临床实践技能前,课堂讲授顺序理论与课堂讲授顺序理论对学生学习准备和学习方法的影响。方法:本研究采用定量与定性相结合的混合研究方法。定量研究方法采用两份有效问卷。使用的第一份问卷是护理教育自主学习准备量表(SDLRSNE)。这是一种自我报告工具,旨在评估学生的态度、能力和自我导向学习所需的个性特征。第二份问卷是修订后的研究过程双因素版本(R-SPQ-2F),以评估学生的深度或表面学习方法。本研究采用黑板学习管理系统(Blackboard learning Management System, LMS)环境,通过学生对学习经验的反思进行定性研究。研究样本包括97名护理专业学生。将学生分为A、b两组,每组47名护生。结果:A组和B组在SDLRSNE自我管理、学习欲望和自我控制方面存在显著差异,表明A组的自我管理对学习的管理优于B组。A组与b组在学习方式上无显著差异。结论:本研究突出了学生的教学和学习体验对学习环境的敏感性。这是通过理论和临床教学的顺序来完成的,在护理课程中反之亦然。适当的学习环境设计和支持性学习工具的可用性鼓励学生学习和教学经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nursing role in early detection of cardiac amyloidosis: a case report Challenges experienced by cancer patients receiving treatment at Oshakati oncology clinic, Oshana region, Namibia Factors associated with hemodialysis adequacy among end stage renal disease patients on maintenance hemodialysis in Rwanda Effect of stacked breathing exercise on reducing pulmonary infection and complications for patients with pleural effusion Nurses' compliance to patient and environmental safety guidelines in critical care units
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1