Delays to Diagnosis and Management of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

W. Taylor
{"title":"Delays to Diagnosis and Management of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma","authors":"W. Taylor","doi":"10.22374/JELEU.V2I3.45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objective \nUpper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is rare in comparison to urothelial carcinoma of the bladder or renal cell carcinoma. UTUC may present with loin pain, haematuria or alternatively can be identified as an incidental finding on imaging. There are often delays to diagnosis as haematuria clinics are efficient for bladder and renal cancer but less effective for UTUC. The diagnosis and treatment of UTUC is more challenging, as it often requires two operations and multiple MDT discussions. Diagnosis must be certain to avoid unnecessary radical surgery. \n  \nWe found that our patients were experiencing significant delays to definitive surgery. Our patients currently follow the pathway for bladder and renal cancer, as there is no UTUC pathway at or trust or published in the literature.  We audited our diagnostic pathway to see how we could tailor the pathway to be more effective for patients with UTUC. This will ensure that more patients will meet the NHS 62-day targets. \n  \nMaterials and Methods \nA retrospective review of patients management pathway from December 2008 to December 2018. Patients were identified by the pathological code for UTUC. \n  \nResults \nA total of 62 patients underwent nephroureterectomy during a 10-year period. 48 patients were analysed. The median waiting time for haematuria clinic from referral was 21days, a further 73 days to ureterorenoscopy and biopsy, and then 14 days to definitive nephroureterectomy. Only one patient met the NHS 62-day treatment target. \n  \nOur waiting times are comparable with other published international series. We have implemented a new UTUC pathway to streamline the diagnosis and management of UTUC. Some patients with UTUC will still have inevitable delays as diagnosis can be very challenging but this new pathway should improve the patient journey and reduce the waiting times significantly.","PeriodicalId":136362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endoluminal Endourology","volume":"120 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endoluminal Endourology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22374/JELEU.V2I3.45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background and Objective Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is rare in comparison to urothelial carcinoma of the bladder or renal cell carcinoma. UTUC may present with loin pain, haematuria or alternatively can be identified as an incidental finding on imaging. There are often delays to diagnosis as haematuria clinics are efficient for bladder and renal cancer but less effective for UTUC. The diagnosis and treatment of UTUC is more challenging, as it often requires two operations and multiple MDT discussions. Diagnosis must be certain to avoid unnecessary radical surgery.   We found that our patients were experiencing significant delays to definitive surgery. Our patients currently follow the pathway for bladder and renal cancer, as there is no UTUC pathway at or trust or published in the literature.  We audited our diagnostic pathway to see how we could tailor the pathway to be more effective for patients with UTUC. This will ensure that more patients will meet the NHS 62-day targets.   Materials and Methods A retrospective review of patients management pathway from December 2008 to December 2018. Patients were identified by the pathological code for UTUC.   Results A total of 62 patients underwent nephroureterectomy during a 10-year period. 48 patients were analysed. The median waiting time for haematuria clinic from referral was 21days, a further 73 days to ureterorenoscopy and biopsy, and then 14 days to definitive nephroureterectomy. Only one patient met the NHS 62-day treatment target.   Our waiting times are comparable with other published international series. We have implemented a new UTUC pathway to streamline the diagnosis and management of UTUC. Some patients with UTUC will still have inevitable delays as diagnosis can be very challenging but this new pathway should improve the patient journey and reduce the waiting times significantly.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
上尿路上皮癌诊断和治疗的延误
背景与目的与膀胱或肾细胞癌的尿路上皮癌相比,上尿道尿路上皮癌(UTUC)是罕见的。UTUC可能表现为腰痛、血尿,也可能是影像学上的偶然发现。由于血尿门诊对膀胱癌和肾癌有效,但对UTUC的效果较差,因此诊断经常出现延误。UTUC的诊断和治疗更具挑战性,因为它通常需要两次手术和多次MDT讨论。诊断必须明确,以避免不必要的根治性手术。我们发现我们的病人在最终手术前经历了严重的延误。我们的患者目前遵循膀胱癌和肾癌的途径,因为在文献中没有可信或已发表的UTUC途径。我们审核了我们的诊断途径,看看我们如何调整途径,使其对UTUC患者更有效。这将确保更多的患者能够达到NHS的62天目标。材料与方法回顾性分析2008年12月至2018年12月的患者管理路径。根据UTUC的病理编码对患者进行鉴定。结果10年间共62例患者行肾输尿管切除术。对48例患者进行分析。从转诊到血尿临床的中位等待时间为21天,输尿管镜检查和活检的等待时间为73天,肾输尿管切除术的等待时间为14天。只有一名患者达到了NHS的62天治疗目标。我们的等待时间与其他出版的国际系列相当。我们已经实施了一个新的UTUC途径,以简化UTUC的诊断和管理。由于诊断非常具有挑战性,一些UTUC患者仍将不可避免地延误,但这种新的途径应该可以改善患者的旅程并显着减少等待时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Inverted Y Ureteral Duplication with Distal Obstructing Calculi in the Ectopic Ureter in the Prostatic Urethra Post-operative Events with Post-operative Day One Stent Removal after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Teflon Injections (STING) Mimicking Distal Ureteric Stones Proceedings of the Welsh Urological Society Annual Meeting The Role of the ClearPetra Suction Access Sheath and UROFINO Disposable Ureteroscope as an Alternative to PCNL/Conventional Flexible Ureteroscopy for a Large Renal Pelvis Stone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1