Clinical outcomes of lumbar disc herniation treated with microdiscectomy.

Hashiguchi Hiroshi, Shirai Yasumasa, Nakayama Yoshihito, Miyamoto Masabumi, Ito Hiromoto
{"title":"Clinical outcomes of lumbar disc herniation treated with microdiscectomy.","authors":"Hashiguchi Hiroshi, Shirai Yasumasa, Nakayama Yoshihito, Miyamoto Masabumi, Ito Hiromoto","doi":"10.3753/YOTSU.8.141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Microdiscectomy was performed on 75 patients (54 males and 21 females with an average age of 35.0 years at operations) diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation. The disc herniations were located as follows: L1-2; 1, L2-3; 2, L3-4; 9, L4-5; 46, and L5-S1; 17. All patients exhibited herniation at a single level. The average follow-up period was 64.4 months. The postoperative outcomes were evaluated according to the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system for lumbar disease and Hirabayashi’s improvement rate. Postoperatively, the average JOA score improved from 12.1 to 26.7 points. Hirabayashi’s improvement rate was 86.4%. A recurrence of same level disc herniation was observed in 3 patients. We conclude that microdiscectomy provided satisfactory postoperative outcome in majority cases. Average intraoperative blood loss was 36.5g. Postoperatively, only 6.7% complained of low back pain, suggesting that this procedure was less invasive. Microdiscectomy has some problems such as a postoperative treatment program and possible recurrence of herniation. However, since microdiscectomy is less invasive and obtains satisfactory postoperative outcomes, it is still considered to be an effective procedure.","PeriodicalId":198659,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Japanese Society of Lumbar Spine Disorders","volume":"129 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Japanese Society of Lumbar Spine Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3753/YOTSU.8.141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Microdiscectomy was performed on 75 patients (54 males and 21 females with an average age of 35.0 years at operations) diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation. The disc herniations were located as follows: L1-2; 1, L2-3; 2, L3-4; 9, L4-5; 46, and L5-S1; 17. All patients exhibited herniation at a single level. The average follow-up period was 64.4 months. The postoperative outcomes were evaluated according to the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system for lumbar disease and Hirabayashi’s improvement rate. Postoperatively, the average JOA score improved from 12.1 to 26.7 points. Hirabayashi’s improvement rate was 86.4%. A recurrence of same level disc herniation was observed in 3 patients. We conclude that microdiscectomy provided satisfactory postoperative outcome in majority cases. Average intraoperative blood loss was 36.5g. Postoperatively, only 6.7% complained of low back pain, suggesting that this procedure was less invasive. Microdiscectomy has some problems such as a postoperative treatment program and possible recurrence of herniation. However, since microdiscectomy is less invasive and obtains satisfactory postoperative outcomes, it is still considered to be an effective procedure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
显微椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效。
对诊断为腰椎间盘突出的75例患者(男性54例,女性21例,手术时平均年龄35.0岁)行显微椎间盘切除术。椎间盘突出的位置如下:L1-2;1、L2-3;2、L3-4;9日,L4-5;46, L5-S1;17. 所有患者均表现为单节段疝。平均随访时间为64.4个月。术后结果根据日本骨科协会腰椎疾病评分系统和Hirabayashi的改善率进行评估。术后平均JOA评分由12.1分提高至26.7分。平林的治愈率为86.4%。3例患者复发为同一水平椎间盘突出。我们认为微椎间盘切除术在大多数病例中提供了满意的术后结果。平均术中出血量为36.5g。术后,只有6.7%的患者抱怨腰痛,这表明该手术的侵入性较小。微椎间盘切除术有一些问题,如术后治疗方案和可能复发的突出。然而,由于微椎间盘切除术创伤小且术后效果满意,因此仍被认为是一种有效的手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A randomized controlled trial of McKenzie therapy for chronic low back pain International Collaboration Beyond the Culture Gap 脊髄終糸の過緊張によって発症した腰痛・下肢痛の診断 (TFT誘発テストについて) 当院における「腰痛クリニック」の治療成績 McKenzie Therapy (MT) による腰痛の治療とClassificationの試み
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1