Free Civil Legal Assistance in the United States, 1863–1980

Felice J Batlan
{"title":"Free Civil Legal Assistance in the United States, 1863–1980","authors":"Felice J Batlan","doi":"10.1093/acrefore/9780199329175.013.804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Legal aid organizations were first created by a variety of private groups during the Civil War to provide legal advice in civil cases to the poor. The growing need for legal aid was deeply connected to industrialization, urbanization, and immigration. A variety of groups created legal aid organizations in response to labor unrest, the increasing number of women in the workforce, the founding of women’s clubs, and the slow and incomplete professionalization of the legal bar. In fact, before women could practice law, or were accepted into the legal profession, a variety of middle-class women’s groups using lay lawyers provided legal aid to poor women. Yet, this rich story of women’s work was later suppressed by leaders of the bar attempting to claim credit for legal aid, assert a monopoly over the practice of law, and professionalize legal assistance. Across time, the largest number of claims brought to legal aid providers involved workers trying to collect wages, domestic relations cases, and landlord tenant issues.\n Until the 1960s, legal aid organizations were largely financed through private donations and philanthropic organizations. After the 1960s, the federal government provided funding to support legal aid, creating significant controversy among lawyers, legal aid providers, and activists as to what types of cases legal aid organizations could take, what services could be provided, and who was eligible. Unlike in many other countries or in criminal cases, in the United States there is no constitutional right to have free counsel in civil cases. This leaves many poor and working-class people without legal advice or access to justice.\n Organizations providing free civil legal services to the poor are ubiquitous across the United States. They are so much part of the modern legal landscape that it is surprising that little historical scholarship exists on such organizations. Yet the history of organized legal aid, which began during the Civil War, is a rich story that brings into view a unique range of historical actors including women’s organizations, lawyers, social workers, community organizations, the state and federal government, and the millions of poor clients who over the last century and a half have sought legal assistance. This history of the development of legal aid is also very much a story about gender, race, professionalization, the development of the welfare state, and ultimately its slow dismantlement. In other words, the history of legal aid provides a window into the larger history of the United States while producing its own series of historical tensions, ironies, and contradictions.\n Although this narrative demonstrates change over time and various ruptures with the past, there are also important continuities in the history of free legal aid. Deceptively simple questions have plagued legal aid for almost a century and have also driven much of the historical scholarship on legal aid. These include: who should provide legal aid services, who should receive free legal aid, what types of cases should legal aid organizations handle, who should fund legal aid, and who benefits from legal aid.","PeriodicalId":105482,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of American History","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of American History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199329175.013.804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Legal aid organizations were first created by a variety of private groups during the Civil War to provide legal advice in civil cases to the poor. The growing need for legal aid was deeply connected to industrialization, urbanization, and immigration. A variety of groups created legal aid organizations in response to labor unrest, the increasing number of women in the workforce, the founding of women’s clubs, and the slow and incomplete professionalization of the legal bar. In fact, before women could practice law, or were accepted into the legal profession, a variety of middle-class women’s groups using lay lawyers provided legal aid to poor women. Yet, this rich story of women’s work was later suppressed by leaders of the bar attempting to claim credit for legal aid, assert a monopoly over the practice of law, and professionalize legal assistance. Across time, the largest number of claims brought to legal aid providers involved workers trying to collect wages, domestic relations cases, and landlord tenant issues. Until the 1960s, legal aid organizations were largely financed through private donations and philanthropic organizations. After the 1960s, the federal government provided funding to support legal aid, creating significant controversy among lawyers, legal aid providers, and activists as to what types of cases legal aid organizations could take, what services could be provided, and who was eligible. Unlike in many other countries or in criminal cases, in the United States there is no constitutional right to have free counsel in civil cases. This leaves many poor and working-class people without legal advice or access to justice. Organizations providing free civil legal services to the poor are ubiquitous across the United States. They are so much part of the modern legal landscape that it is surprising that little historical scholarship exists on such organizations. Yet the history of organized legal aid, which began during the Civil War, is a rich story that brings into view a unique range of historical actors including women’s organizations, lawyers, social workers, community organizations, the state and federal government, and the millions of poor clients who over the last century and a half have sought legal assistance. This history of the development of legal aid is also very much a story about gender, race, professionalization, the development of the welfare state, and ultimately its slow dismantlement. In other words, the history of legal aid provides a window into the larger history of the United States while producing its own series of historical tensions, ironies, and contradictions. Although this narrative demonstrates change over time and various ruptures with the past, there are also important continuities in the history of free legal aid. Deceptively simple questions have plagued legal aid for almost a century and have also driven much of the historical scholarship on legal aid. These include: who should provide legal aid services, who should receive free legal aid, what types of cases should legal aid organizations handle, who should fund legal aid, and who benefits from legal aid.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国的免费民事法律援助,1863-1980
法律援助组织最初是由各种私人团体在内战期间创建的,目的是为穷人提供民事案件的法律咨询。对法律援助日益增长的需求与工业化、城市化和移民密切相关。各种各样的团体创建了法律援助组织,以应对劳工骚乱、劳动力中妇女人数的增加、妇女俱乐部的成立以及法律酒吧的缓慢和不完整的专业化。事实上,在妇女能够从事法律工作或被接受从事法律职业之前,各种中产阶级妇女团体就利用非专业律师为贫穷妇女提供法律援助。然而,这个关于妇女工作的丰富故事后来被律师协会的领导人压制,他们试图将法律援助归功于自己,主张对法律实践的垄断,并使法律援助专业化。随着时间的推移,向法律援助机构提出的最多的索赔涉及试图收取工资的工人,家庭关系案件和房东房客问题。直到20世纪60年代,法律援助组织的资金主要来自私人捐赠和慈善组织。20世纪60年代以后,联邦政府提供资金支持法律援助,这在律师、法律援助提供者和活动家之间产生了巨大的争议,关于法律援助机构可以接受什么类型的案件,可以提供什么服务,以及谁有资格。与许多其他国家或刑事案件不同,美国在民事案件中没有享有免费律师的宪法权利。这使得许多穷人和工薪阶层无法获得法律咨询或诉诸司法。为穷人提供免费民事法律服务的组织在美国随处可见。它们是现代法律景观的重要组成部分,令人惊讶的是,关于这些组织的历史学术研究很少。然而,有组织的法律援助的历史始于内战时期,是一个丰富的故事,它使人们认识到一系列独特的历史参与者,包括妇女组织、律师、社会工作者、社区组织、州和联邦政府,以及在过去一个半世纪中寻求法律援助的数百万贫困客户。法律援助发展的历史在很大程度上也是一个关于性别、种族、专业化、福利国家发展以及最终缓慢解体的故事。换句话说,法律援助的历史提供了一个窗口,进入更大的美国历史,同时产生了自己的一系列历史紧张,讽刺和矛盾。虽然这种叙述显示了随着时间的推移而发生的变化以及与过去的各种破裂,但免费法律援助的历史也有重要的连续性。看似简单的问题困扰了法律援助近一个世纪,也推动了许多关于法律援助的历史研究。这些问题包括:谁应该提供法律援助服务,谁应该获得免费法律援助,法律援助机构应该办理什么类型的案件,谁应该资助法律援助,谁应该从法律援助中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Environmental History of New England Atlantic History Death and Dying in the Working Class Civil War Regiments Red Summer and Early 20th-Century Race Massacres
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1