{"title":"The Effect of Passing Time on Self-reported Satisfaction with Hearing Aid Amplification","authors":"B. Mcleod, L. Upfold","doi":"10.1375/AUDI.25.1.28.31123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The self-report inventory Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life (SADL) has been found to give significantly different results if applied at 2 weeks and 12 months post-fitting. This finding did not indicate when satisfaction is stabilised. While a number of studies have suggested benefit from aid fitting is stabilised by 4-6 weeks post-fitting, benefit is only a small part of satisfaction as measured by the SADL. As a consequence, there can be no certainty that the time delay between fitting and stability of benefit is similar to that of satisfaction. An investigation was undertaken of post-fitting changes in satisfaction as measured by the SADL. A total of 383 pensioner clients were asked to complete the SADL at times ranging from 2 weeks to 12 months post-fitting. A net return of 281 SADLs was obtained, with different rates of return depending on time since fitting and method of administration. Factors related to non-return were also investigated. Satisfaction was assessed for eight different times post-fitting. The results indicated that different aspects of satisfaction stabilise to long-term levels at different times after fitting. It was concluded that application of the SADL before the third month postfitting will overestimate long-term satisfaction in three of the five measures provided. As a consequence, decisions must be taken regarding when, and how, the measurement is to be performed.","PeriodicalId":114768,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1375/AUDI.25.1.28.31123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
The self-report inventory Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life (SADL) has been found to give significantly different results if applied at 2 weeks and 12 months post-fitting. This finding did not indicate when satisfaction is stabilised. While a number of studies have suggested benefit from aid fitting is stabilised by 4-6 weeks post-fitting, benefit is only a small part of satisfaction as measured by the SADL. As a consequence, there can be no certainty that the time delay between fitting and stability of benefit is similar to that of satisfaction. An investigation was undertaken of post-fitting changes in satisfaction as measured by the SADL. A total of 383 pensioner clients were asked to complete the SADL at times ranging from 2 weeks to 12 months post-fitting. A net return of 281 SADLs was obtained, with different rates of return depending on time since fitting and method of administration. Factors related to non-return were also investigated. Satisfaction was assessed for eight different times post-fitting. The results indicated that different aspects of satisfaction stabilise to long-term levels at different times after fitting. It was concluded that application of the SADL before the third month postfitting will overestimate long-term satisfaction in three of the five measures provided. As a consequence, decisions must be taken regarding when, and how, the measurement is to be performed.