The Connection of Thought, Culture and Language: Revoking Myth Unveiling Truth

Khairuddin Khairuddin
{"title":"The Connection of Thought, Culture and Language: Revoking Myth Unveiling Truth","authors":"Khairuddin Khairuddin","doi":"10.53565/nivedana.v2i2.320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scholars and laymen alike are interested in understanding how thought, culture and language are related. Misunderstanding of this relatedness may have serious consequences: legislators make misleading constitutions, judges impose wrong legal rulings and imprisonment on the innocent, and educators apply ineffective pedagogy. Relativism and mentalism, the two leading linguistic schools of thought, have been around in sharp differences explaining about the relation between thought, culture and language. Relativism believes that language precedes, determines, and influence or shapes though, whereas mentalism hypothesizes the contrary that it is thought that creates and changes language. This article describes the theoretical concepts and empirical proofs underlying the two views of linguistic views. By using literature comparative analysis, this study has found that mentalism has strong standpoints in comparison with relativism’s which have weak standpoints. This study also presents implications for language learning that are rooted in the mentalism conception. \n ","PeriodicalId":345264,"journal":{"name":"NIVEDANA : Jurnal Komunikasi dan Bahasa","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NIVEDANA : Jurnal Komunikasi dan Bahasa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53565/nivedana.v2i2.320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scholars and laymen alike are interested in understanding how thought, culture and language are related. Misunderstanding of this relatedness may have serious consequences: legislators make misleading constitutions, judges impose wrong legal rulings and imprisonment on the innocent, and educators apply ineffective pedagogy. Relativism and mentalism, the two leading linguistic schools of thought, have been around in sharp differences explaining about the relation between thought, culture and language. Relativism believes that language precedes, determines, and influence or shapes though, whereas mentalism hypothesizes the contrary that it is thought that creates and changes language. This article describes the theoretical concepts and empirical proofs underlying the two views of linguistic views. By using literature comparative analysis, this study has found that mentalism has strong standpoints in comparison with relativism’s which have weak standpoints. This study also presents implications for language learning that are rooted in the mentalism conception.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
思想、文化和语言的联系:打破神话揭示真理
学者和外行都对理解思想、文化和语言之间的关系感兴趣。对这种关系的误解可能会产生严重的后果:立法者制定误导性的宪法,法官对无辜者施加错误的法律裁决和监禁,教育者采用无效的教学方法。相对主义和唯心主义是两大主要的语言思想流派,在解释思想、文化和语言之间的关系方面存在着尖锐的分歧。相对主义认为语言先于、决定、影响或塑造思想,而唯心主义则相反,认为是思想创造和改变了语言。本文阐述了这两种语言学观点的理论概念和实证依据。通过文献对比分析,本研究发现唯心主义的观点较强,而相对主义的观点较弱。本研究还提出了基于心灵主义概念的语言学习的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN BAHASA INDONESIA MELALUI APLIKASI HALO BAHASA PADA MAHASISWA SEKOLAH TINGGI AGAMA BUDDHA NEGERI RADEN WIJAYA WONOGIRI MAKNA SELF-HEALING DALAM LIRIK LAGU SATU-SATU KARYA IDGITAF STRATEGI KOMUNIKASI PENYULUHAN DALAM MENUMBUHKAN KESADARAN BERAGAMA PADA KALANGAN REMAJA OLEH ORGANISASI MASJID DI KOTA MEDAN MANAGEMENT OF THE ISSUE OF DELAYS IN THE DISBURSEMENT OF ELECTION PANTARLIH HONORS FOR THE 2024 ELECTION IN EAST JAVA VIA INSTAGRAM STRATEGI KOMUNIKASI DALAM MENINGKATKAN PUBLIC SPEAKING PADA KARYAWAN ALFADH PARFUM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1