Athletic or Antisocial? The Female Sport Experience

S. Jackson, H. Marsh
{"title":"Athletic or Antisocial? The Female Sport Experience","authors":"S. Jackson, H. Marsh","doi":"10.1123/JSP.8.3.198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to examine relations between women's involvment in sports and three psychological constructs: role conflict, sex-role identification, and multidimensional self-concepts. The three groups comprised female powerlifters competing in a national championship (n = 30), high school female athletes (n = 46), and high school female nonathletes (n = 46). Role conflict was not substantial except for a few specific areas related to conflicting expectations of appropriate female and athlete behavior. Both athletic groups scored substantially higher on masculinity (M) and on self-concept of physical ability than the nonathletic group, but there were no group differences on femininity (F) and few substantial differences in other areas of self-concept. Hence the results provide further support for the construct validity of androgyny and for the multidimensionality of self-concept. The major findings, that female athletes can be more M without being less F, and that female athletic involvemen...","PeriodicalId":442839,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Sport Psychology","volume":"117 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"93","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Sport Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/JSP.8.3.198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 93

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine relations between women's involvment in sports and three psychological constructs: role conflict, sex-role identification, and multidimensional self-concepts. The three groups comprised female powerlifters competing in a national championship (n = 30), high school female athletes (n = 46), and high school female nonathletes (n = 46). Role conflict was not substantial except for a few specific areas related to conflicting expectations of appropriate female and athlete behavior. Both athletic groups scored substantially higher on masculinity (M) and on self-concept of physical ability than the nonathletic group, but there were no group differences on femininity (F) and few substantial differences in other areas of self-concept. Hence the results provide further support for the construct validity of androgyny and for the multidimensionality of self-concept. The major findings, that female athletes can be more M without being less F, and that female athletic involvemen...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
爱运动还是反社会?女性运动体验
摘要本研究旨在探讨女性参与体育运动与角色冲突、性别角色认同和多维自我概念的关系。这三组包括参加全国锦标赛的女举重运动员(n = 30)、高中女运动员(n = 46)和高中非运动员(n = 46)。角色冲突并不严重,除了一些特定领域与女性和运动员的适当行为期望冲突有关。两个运动组在男性气质(M)和体能自我概念上的得分都明显高于非运动组,但在女性气质(F)上没有组间差异,在自我概念的其他方面几乎没有实质性差异。本研究结果为双性同体的建构效度和自我概念的多维性提供了进一步的支持。主要发现是,女运动员可以在不减少F的情况下增加M,并且女性运动参与……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effects of Visual Occlusion Training and Visual Allowance Training on Perceptual Distance and Actual Performance Distance of Golf Putting Conceptualizing the Construct of Athletic Identity in Korean Elite Athletes The Effects of the ACT-based Career Group Counseling Program for Retired Athletes in Their Teens A Study on Self-controlled Learning in Practice Conditions of Faded and Increased Feedback The Effect of Contextual Interference in Attentional Focus on Learning of Badminton High-Clear
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1