A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE QUALITY OF LEADERSHIP AMONG IMAMS AND RELIGION TEACHERS

Derviš Vrešlija, Safet Beganović
{"title":"A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE QUALITY OF LEADERSHIP AMONG IMAMS AND RELIGION TEACHERS","authors":"Derviš Vrešlija, Safet Beganović","doi":"10.51728/issn.2637-1480.2019.16.161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the paper is to make a comparative analysis of the quality of leadership among imams and religion teachers, i.e. based on the attitudes of imams and religion teachers to conclude whether there is a difference in the frequency of application of different leadership styles. We used a method of theoretical analysis, a descriptive-analytical survey method, and a technique of survey data collection. The research instruments were a Background Data Questionnaire and a Leadership Behavior Questionnaire - Leadership Styles (Pearce & Sims, 2002). The research sample consisted of 100 imams and 100 religion teachers coming from the Zenica-Doboj Canton. Our findings showed that the leadership by imams is statistically significantly more characterized by: intimidation, reprimand, setting goals, instructions and commands, providing material and personal rewards, disagreement with the current situation and vision. On the other hand, the leadership by religion teachers is statistically significantly characterized more by: the team's functional efficiency, the qualitative efficiency of the team, efficiency of introducing changes, efficiency of organization and planning, interpersonal efficiency, efficiency evaluation, and overall efficiency. The following styles were found to be common to both imams and religion teachers: idealism, inspirational communication, intellectual stimulation, support to the reward system, encouraging independent actions, support to thinking and support to personal progress.","PeriodicalId":246084,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik radova 16","volume":"374 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik radova 16","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51728/issn.2637-1480.2019.16.161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to make a comparative analysis of the quality of leadership among imams and religion teachers, i.e. based on the attitudes of imams and religion teachers to conclude whether there is a difference in the frequency of application of different leadership styles. We used a method of theoretical analysis, a descriptive-analytical survey method, and a technique of survey data collection. The research instruments were a Background Data Questionnaire and a Leadership Behavior Questionnaire - Leadership Styles (Pearce & Sims, 2002). The research sample consisted of 100 imams and 100 religion teachers coming from the Zenica-Doboj Canton. Our findings showed that the leadership by imams is statistically significantly more characterized by: intimidation, reprimand, setting goals, instructions and commands, providing material and personal rewards, disagreement with the current situation and vision. On the other hand, the leadership by religion teachers is statistically significantly characterized more by: the team's functional efficiency, the qualitative efficiency of the team, efficiency of introducing changes, efficiency of organization and planning, interpersonal efficiency, efficiency evaluation, and overall efficiency. The following styles were found to be common to both imams and religion teachers: idealism, inspirational communication, intellectual stimulation, support to the reward system, encouraging independent actions, support to thinking and support to personal progress.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊玛目与宗教教师领导素质的比较分析
本文的目的是对伊玛目和宗教教师的领导质量进行比较分析,即基于伊玛目和宗教教师的态度,得出不同领导风格的使用频率是否存在差异。我们采用了理论分析方法、描述性分析调查方法和调查数据收集技术。研究工具是背景数据问卷和领导行为问卷-领导风格(皮尔斯和西姆斯,2002年)。研究样本包括来自Zenica-Doboj州的100名伊玛目和100名宗教教师。研究结果表明,伊玛目的领导方式在恐吓、训斥、设定目标、指示和命令、提供物质和个人奖励、不认同现状和愿景等方面具有统计学上的显著性。另一方面,宗教教师的领导在团队的功能效率、团队的质性效率、变革的引入效率、组织策划效率、人际效率、效率评价和整体效率方面具有显著的统计学意义。研究发现,伊玛目和宗教教师的共同风格如下:理想主义、鼓舞人心的交流、智力刺激、支持奖励制度、鼓励独立行动、支持思考和支持个人进步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
AN EVALUATION OF FIVE KEY ASPECTS OF THE LANGUAGE ACQUISITION (LA) – A CRITICAL REVIEW OF KRASHEN`S THEORY GOOD WATER PILGRIMAGE NEAR FOČA THE MOTIF OF DREAMS IN ANDRIĆ’S SHORT STORIES A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE TRADITIONAL AND INTERACTIVE LEARNING IN ISLAMIC RELIGION CLASSES THE FUNCTION OF THE SEMANTIC FIELD OF MOTION VERBS IN PROMOTING THE QUR’ANIC INTENTIONS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1